Animated Solution for Mathematics - Complex Numbers: The least value of ∣z∣ where z is complex number which satisfies the inequality exp(∣∣z∣+1∣(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)loge2)≥log2∣57+9i∣, i=−1, is equal to :
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
The Complex Inequality
Given inequality: exp(∣∣z∣+1∣(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)loge2)≥log2∣57+9i∣
We need to find the minimum value of ∣z∣.
Simplifying the Exponential
Using the property: ealnb=ba
LHS becomes: 2∣∣z∣+1∣(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)
Handling the Modulus Denominator
Since ∣z∣≥0, then ∣z∣+1≥1
Therefore, ∣∣z∣+1∣=∣z∣+1
Simplified LHS: 2∣z∣+1(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)
Calculating the RHS Modulus
Calculate ∣57+9i∣
∣57+9i∣=(57)2+92
=175+81=256=16
Simplifying the RHS Logarithm
RHS: log216
Using logakbn=knlogab:
log22124=214log22=8
Note: 8=23
Comparing the Exponents
Inequality: 2∣z∣+1(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)≥23
Since base 2>1:
∣z∣+1(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)≥3
Cross-Multiplication
Cross-multiply by ∣z∣+1 (which is >0):
(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)≥3(∣z∣+1)
Expanding the Expressions
Expand LHS: ∣z∣2+3∣z∣−∣z∣−3≥3∣z∣+3
Simplify: ∣z∣2+2∣z∣−3≥3∣z∣+3
Rearranging to Standard Form
Subtract 3∣z∣+3 from both sides:
∣z∣2−∣z∣−6≥0
Factoring the Quadratic
Factorize ∣z∣2−∣z∣−6≥0:
(∣z∣−3)(∣z∣+2)≥0
Solving for ∣z∣
Since ∣z∣≥0, then ∣z∣+2≥2>0
Therefore, we must have ∣z∣−3≥0
This implies ∣z∣≥3
The Final Answer
Least value of ∣z∣ is 3.
Geometrically, z lies on or outside a circle of radius 3.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Conjugate and Modulus
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, fellow traveler, to the beautiful world of complex numbers. Today, we are going to dismantle a problem that, at first glance, looks like a chaotic storm of exponentials, logarithms, and moduli.
By the end of this journey, you will see it for what it truly is: an elegant, structured dance of algebra.
Taming the Beast
Let us look at our given inequality:
exp(∣∣z∣+1∣(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)loge2)≥log2∣57+9i∣
The key to solving complex problems is to simplify them piece by piece. Recall the golden rule of logarithms: ealnb=ba.
Applying this, our left-hand side transforms beautifully into:
2∣∣z∣+1∣∣(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)
Since ∣z∣ is a distance, it is always non-negative. Thus, ∣z∣+1 is at least 1, which is strictly positive. We can drop those outer modulus bars without a second thought, simplifying the expression to:
2∣z∣+1(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)
The Right-Hand Side Revelation
Now, let's turn our attention to the right-hand side. We need to calculate the magnitude of the complex number 57+9i.
This is the distance from the origin:
(57)2+92=175+81=256=16
So, the right-hand side is log216. We know 16=24 and 2=21/2.
Using the property logakbn=knlogab, we get:
1/24log22=8=23
Our inequality is now:
2∣z∣+1(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)≥23
The Final Algebraic Push
Since the base 2 is greater than 1, the exponential function is strictly increasing. This allows us to compare the exponents directly:
∣z∣+1(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)≥3
We can safely multiply both sides by ∣z∣+1 because it is positive. This leads us to:
(∣z∣+3)(∣z∣−1)≥3(∣z∣+1)
Expanding this, we get ∣z∣2+2∣z∣−3≥3∣z∣+3. Bringing everything to one side, we arrive at the quadratic inequality:
∣z∣2−∣z∣−6≥0
Factoring this, we get (∣z∣−3)(∣z∣+2)≥0. Since ∣z∣+2 is always positive, the inequality holds if and only if ∣z∣−3≥0, which means ∣z∣≥3.
Conclusion
Geometrically, this means z lies on or outside a circle of radius 3 centered at the origin. The least value of ∣z∣ is therefore 3.
You have successfully navigated the storm and found the calm center. Remember, no matter how complex the problem, there is always a path to simplicity if you take it one step at a time.