Animated Solution for Mathematics - Complex Numbers: If ∣z−4/z∣=2, then the maximum value of ∣Z∣ is equal to
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Understanding the Constraint
Given condition: ∣z−z4∣=2
Objective: Find the maximum value of ∣z∣
The Algebraic Manipulation
We can rewrite z as:
z=(z−z4)+z4
The Triangle Inequality
Recall the Triangle Inequality for complex numbers:
∣a+b∣≤∣a∣+∣b∣
Applying the Inequality
Let a=z−z4 and b=z4
∣z∣=∣(z−z4)+z4∣≤∣z−z4∣+∣z4∣
Substituting Known Values
Substitute ∣z−z4∣=2
Using property ∣ba∣=∣b∣∣a∣:
∣z∣≤2+∣z∣4
Clearing the Denominator
Since ∣z∣>0, multiply the entire inequality by ∣z∣:
∣z∣2≤2∣z∣+4
Forming the Quadratic Inequality
Bring all terms to one side:
∣z∣2−2∣z∣−4≤0
Finding the Critical Points
Let x=∣z∣. Solve x2−2x−4=0
Using the quadratic formula: x=2a−b±b2−4ac
Calculating the Roots
x=2(1)−(−2)±(−2)2−4(1)(−4)
x=22±4+16=22±20
x=22±25=1±5
Analyzing the Range and Maximum
The inequality ∣z∣2−2∣z∣−4≤0 implies:
1−5≤∣z∣≤1+5
Since ∣z∣≥0, the maximum value is 1+5
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Conjugate and Modulus
Solution Diagram
The Geometry of Complex Numbers
A Journey of Constraints
Welcome, fellow traveler on the path to JEE mastery! Today, we are going to unravel a problem that might look like a simple algebraic exercise, but is actually a beautiful dance of geometry in the complex plane.
We are given the condition ∣z−z4∣=2, and our mission is to find the maximum possible value of ∣z∣.
The Art of Manipulation
When you first look at ∣z−z4∣=2, it feels like a locked box. We have information about the difference between z and its reciprocal, but we want to know about z itself.
The secret lies in a simple, yet profound, algebraic trick. We want to express z in a way that incorporates the term we already know. Let's perform a little magic by adding and subtracting the same term:
z=(z−z4)+z4
We haven't changed the value of z at all, but we have successfully partitioned it into two parts: one that we know the magnitude of, and one that is just a scaled version of the reciprocal. This is the key to unlocking the problem.
The Power of the Triangle Inequality
Now that we have z in this form, we need to relate its magnitude to the magnitudes of its parts. This is where the Triangle Inequality comes to our rescue.
It states that for any two complex numbers a and b, the magnitude of their sum is always less than or equal to the sum of their individual magnitudes:
∣a+b∣≤∣a∣+∣b∣
Geometrically, this is the statement that the length of one side of a triangle cannot exceed the sum of the lengths of the other two sides. Let's apply this to our expression for z, where a=(z−z4) and b=z4:
∣z∣=(z−z4)+z4≤z−z4+z4
The Substitution Phase
The pieces of the puzzle now start to fall into place. We know from the problem statement that ∣z−z4∣=2.
Using the property of moduli that ∣ba∣=∣b∣∣a∣, we know that ∣z4∣ becomes ∣z∣4. Substituting these into our inequality, we get:
∣z∣≤2+∣z∣4
This is a beautiful result! We have successfully turned a complex number problem into a simple inequality involving only the magnitude ∣z∣.
Taming the Quadratic
Since ∣z∣ is a magnitude, it is strictly positive, so we can safely multiply the entire inequality by ∣z∣ without worrying about flipping the sign. This gives us:
∣z∣2≤2∣z∣+4
Bringing everything to one side, we get the quadratic inequality:
∣z∣2−2∣z∣−4≤0
Let's treat ∣z∣ as a variable, say x. We are looking for the range of x that satisfies x2−2x−4≤0. To find the boundaries, we solve the equation x2−2x−4=0 using the quadratic formula:
x=2(1)−(−2)±(−2)2−4(1)(−4)=22±20=1±5
The Final Victory
Our quadratic inequality tells us that ∣z∣ must lie between 1−5 and 1+5. Since ∣z∣ must be non-negative, the lower bound is effectively zero.
The maximum value, therefore, is the upper bound of our range. The maximum possible value of ∣z∣ is 1+5.