Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, fellow traveler on the path to JEE mastery. Today, we are not just solving an equation; we are exploring the beautiful, hidden symmetry of the complex plane.
We are given the equation z2+izˉ=0, with the vital constraint that $xy
eq 0$. This constraint is not just a footnote; it is a signpost telling us that our solution cannot lie on the axes. Let us embark on this journey to find ∣z∣2.
The Strategic Rearrangement
When you face an equation like z2+izˉ=0, your first instinct might be to expand z into x+iy. While that is a valid path, it is often a path through a dense forest of algebra.
Instead, let us look for a more elegant route. We want to isolate the terms to analyze their magnitudes. By moving the term izˉ to the right side, we get:
This simple act of balancing the equation is the first step toward clarity. We have now separated the complex variables, setting the stage for a powerful transformation.
The Modulus Transformation
Now, we arrive at the most critical moment of our journey. Whenever you see an equation containing both z and its conjugate zˉ, taking the modulus on both sides is a transformative tool.
It acts like a lens, focusing our attention on the distance from the origin rather than the specific coordinates. Applying the modulus, we get:
This step is profound because it converts a complex equation into a real-valued one, stripping away the imaginary components that often obscure the truth.
The Toolkit of Properties
To proceed, we must reach into our mathematical toolkit. We recall three fundamental properties of the modulus: the power rule ∣zn∣=∣z∣n, the product rule ∣z1z2∣=∣z1∣∣z2∣, and the conjugate rule ∣zˉ∣=∣z∣.
These are not just formulas; they are the laws of the complex universe. Applying these, the left side of our equation, ∣z2∣, becomes ∣z∣2. On the right side, we split the modulus:
Since ∣−i∣=1 and ∣zˉ∣=∣z∣, the right side simplifies beautifully to just ∣z∣. Our complex equation has now collapsed into the simple, elegant form:
The Trap and the Truth
We are almost there, but we must be careful. A common mistake is to simply divide by ∣z∣, which would lose a potential solution.
Instead, we bring everything to one side:
Factoring this, we get ∣z∣(∣z∣−1)=0. This gives us two possibilities: ∣z∣=0 or ∣z∣=1.
This is where the constraint $xy
eq 0$ becomes our guide. If ∣z∣=0, then z must be the origin, meaning x=0 and y=0, which makes xy=0. This violates our constraint! Thus, we reject ∣z∣=0. The only valid solution is ∣z∣=1.
Final Calculation
We have arrived at the destination. We know ∣z∣=1.
The question asks for ∣z∣2. Since ∣z∣=1, it follows that:
We have navigated the traps, applied the properties, and arrived at the answer with precision. The final result is 1.