Animated Solution for Mathematics - Complex Numbers: If z=0 be a complex number such that ∣z−z1∣=2, then the maximum value of ∣z∣ is:
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Understanding the Given Condition
Given: z=0 and ∣z−z1∣=2.
Objective: Find the maximum value of ∣z∣.
Recalling the Triangle Inequality
Using the reverse Triangle Inequality property:
∣∣a∣−∣b∣∣≤∣a−b∣
Applying the Property to z and z1
Substitute a=z and b=z1 into the inequality:
∣∣z∣−∣z1∣∣≤∣z−z1∣
Substituting the Known Value
Since ∣z−z1∣=2, we substitute this into the right side:
∣∣z∣−∣z∣1∣≤2
Defining ∣z∣=r
Let ∣z∣=r, where r>0 (since it represents distance).
The inequality becomes: ∣r−r1∣≤2
Focusing on the Upper Bound
To find the maximum r, we consider the upper bound of the absolute value:
r−r1≤2
Forming the Quadratic Inequality
Multiply the entire inequality by r (valid since r>0):
r2−1≤2r
Rearranging to Standard Form
Bring all terms to one side:
r2−2r−1≤0
Finding the Roots of the Quadratic
Solve r2−2r−1=0 using the quadratic formula:
r=22±4−4(1)(−1)
r=22±8=1±2
Analyzing the Range of r
The solution to the inequality is: 1−2≤r≤1+2
Since r>0, the valid range is: 0<r≤1+2
Conclusion and Final Answer
The maximum value of ∣z∣ is 1+2 or 2+1.
Correct Option: (4)
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Conjugate and Modulus
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Setup
We are given a non-zero complex number z such that the distance between z and its reciprocal, z1, is exactly 2. Our objective is to determine the maximum possible distance of z from the origin, which is the maximum value of ∣z∣.
The Power of the Triangle Inequality
When dealing with complex numbers and their moduli, the Reverse Triangle Inequality is our most trusted tool. It states that for any two complex numbers a and b, the absolute difference of their moduli is less than or equal to the modulus of their difference:
∣∣a∣−∣b∣∣≤∣a−b∣
This is a fundamental geometric truth, representing the fact that the difference in lengths cannot exceed the length of the vector connecting the two points. By setting a=z and b=z1, we obtain:
∣∣z∣−∣z1∣∣≤∣z−z1∣
The Elegant Substitution
We are given that ∣z−z1∣=2. Recalling that the modulus of a reciprocal is the reciprocal of the modulus, we have ∣z1∣=∣z∣1.
Let us define a new variable r=∣z∣, where r>0 as it represents a distance. Substituting these into our inequality, we arrive at a much cleaner expression:
∣r−r1∣≤2
This inequality serves as the heart of the problem, constraining the distance r. To find the maximum value of r, we focus on the upper bound of this absolute value inequality:
r−r1≤2
Solving the Quadratic
Since r is a positive distance, we can multiply the entire inequality by r without reversing the inequality sign. This yields:
r2−1≤2r
Rearranging this into a standard quadratic inequality, we get:
r2−2r−1≤0
To find the critical points, we solve the corresponding quadratic equation r2−2r−1=0 using the quadratic formula r=2a−b±b2−4ac:
r=22±4−4(1)(−1)=22±8=1±2
The Final Revelation
We have two roots: 1−2 and 1+2. Since the quadratic expression r2−2r−1 must be less than or equal to zero, r must lie between these two roots.
We must respect the physical constraint that r>0. Because 1−2 is negative, the valid range for r is 0<r≤1+2.
Thus, the maximum value of ∣z∣ is 1+2. This result defines the boundary of the set of all complex numbers satisfying the given condition.