Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing before a vast, empty canvas representing our sample space, a set of ten equally likely outcomes. This is our universe, S, where n(S)=10.
Within this universe, we have an event A that claims four of these outcomes for itself. We know n(A)=4, which gives us a probability:
Now, we introduce a mysterious event B. We do not know its size, so let us call it x, meaning n(B)=x. We also have an intersection, the shared territory between A and B, which we will call y, so n(A∩B)=y.
The Heart of Independence
What does it truly mean for two events to be independent? It means that the occurrence of one provides absolutely no information about the occurrence of the other.
Mathematically, this is expressed as the elegant condition:
This is the heartbeat of our problem. Let us translate this into the language of our counts. We know P(A∩B)=10y, P(A)=104, and P(B)=10x.
Substituting these into our independence condition, we get:
The Algebraic Journey
Now, let us simplify this. Multiplying both sides by 10, we find:
This is a beautiful, simple relationship. However, we must respect the constraints of our reality. Since y is the number of outcomes in the intersection of two sets, it must be an integer.
For y=52x to be an integer, 2x must be divisible by 5. Since 2 and 5 share no common factors, x itself must be a multiple of 5.
The Final Revelation
We know that B is a non-empty event, so x>0. We also know that B is a subset of our sample space of ten, so x≤10.
The multiples of 5 in the range 0<x≤10 are exactly 5 and 10. Let us test them:
If x=5, then y=52(5)=2, which is a valid integer.
If x=10, then y=52(10)=4, which is also a valid integer.
Thus, the possible values for the number of outcomes in B are 5 and 10. We have navigated the constraints, respected the definitions, and arrived at the truth.