Analyzing the Setup
Let us define our variables. We have the common root α.
For the first equation, x2−6x+a=0, the roots are α and 4k.
For the second equation, x2−cx+6=0, the roots are α and 3k. The ratio of the other roots is 4:3, which serves as our bridge between the two equations.
The critical constraint is that 4k and 3k must be integers. This is the filter through which our final answer must pass.
The Power of Vieta's Formulas
Now, we invoke the wisdom of Vieta. For the first equation, the sum of the roots is given by:
This is our first anchor.
Next, we look at the second equation, x2−cx+6=0. We know the product of the roots is the constant term 6:
Simplifying this, we obtain:
This is our second anchor.
The Algebraic Dance
We now have a system of equations: α+4k=6 and αk=2.
From the first equation, we can write 4k=6−α, or k=46−α.
Substituting this into our second equation, we get:
Multiplying by 4, we obtain α(6−α)=8, which expands to 6α−α2=8.
Rearranging this, we arrive at the quadratic:
The Final Verdict
Factoring this quadratic is straightforward:
This gives us two candidates: α=2 or α=4.
We must now return to our integer constraint.
If α=2, then k=46−2=1. The other roots are 4(1)=4 and 3(1)=3. Since both are integers, this is a valid solution.
If α=4, then k=46−4=0.5. The other roots are 4(0.5)=2 and 3(0.5)=1.5.
Since 1.5 is not an integer, this solution is invalid. Thus, the only possible common root is α=2.