Substitute y=0 directly into the simplified expression.
(1+1+0+2)(1+0+1)1
Evaluate the Brackets
First bracket: 1+1+2=22
Second bracket: 1+1=2
Denominator becomes: 22⋅2
Final Calculation
Final result: 421
Key Takeaway: Double rationalization is highly effective for nested radical limits.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Evaluation of Limits & L'Hopital's Rule
Analyzing the Setup
We are evaluating the limit:
y→0limy41+1+y4−2
Upon direct substitution of y=0, the expression yields 01+1−2=00. This confirms an indeterminate form, signaling that a factor of y4 must be extracted from the numerator to cancel the denominator.
The First Rationalization
To eliminate the outer radical, we multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate 1+1+y4+2. Applying the identity (a−b)(a+b)=a2−b2, the numerator becomes:
(1+1+y4)2−(2)2=1+1+y4−2=1+y4−1
The limit expression now stands as:
y→0limy4(1+1+y4+2)1+y4−1
The Second Rationalization
Substituting y=0 again results in another 0/0 form. We must rationalize the remaining radical 1+y4−1 by multiplying the numerator and denominator by 1+y4+1. The numerator simplifies as follows:
(1+y4)2−(1)2=1+y4−1=y4
This step successfully isolates the y4 term. The expression is now:
y→0limy4(1+1+y4+2)(1+y4+1)y4
Final Calculation
We cancel the y4 terms from the numerator and the denominator. We are left with:
y→0lim(1+1+y4+2)(1+y4+1)1
Now, we perform direct substitution by setting y=0:
1. The first bracket: 1+1+0+2=2+2=22
2. The second bracket: 1+0+1=1+1=2
Multiplying these results, we obtain 22⋅2=42. Therefore, the final value of the limit is: