This sets up the denominator for the difference of squares formula: (a−b)(a+b)=a2−b2
Simplifying the Denominator
Apply (a−b)(a+b)=a2−b2 to the denominator:
(2)2−(1+cosx)2
=2−(1+cosx)
=1−cosx
The Transformed Limit
The limit expression is now simplified to:
limx→01−cosxsin2x⋅(2+1+cosx)
We still have a 00 form, so we need trigonometric identities.
Trigonometric Half-Angle Identities
Recall the half-angle identity for cosine: 1−cosx=2sin2(2x)
Recall the double-angle identity for sine: sinx=2sin(2x)cos(2x)
Squaring the sine identity gives: sin2x=4sin2(2x)cos2(2x)
Substituting the Identities
Substitute the identities into the limit:
Numerator: 4sin2(2x)cos2(2x)⋅(2+1+cosx)
Denominator: 2sin2(2x)
limx→02sin2(2x)4sin2(2x)cos2(2x)(2+1+cosx)
Cancellation and Simplification
Cancel the common term sin2(2x) from numerator and denominator.
Simplify the constants: 24=2
The limit simplifies to: limx→02cos2(2x)(2+1+cosx)
Final Substitution
Now that the indeterminate form is removed, substitute x=0:
=2⋅cos2(0)⋅(2+1+cos(0))
We know cos(0)=1.
=2⋅(1)2⋅(2+1+1)
The Final Answer
Simplify the expression:
=2⋅1⋅(2+2)
=2⋅(22)
=42
The limit approaches 42 as x→0.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Evaluation of Limits & L'Hopital's Rule
Solution Diagram
Welcome, future engineer. Today, we are going to dissect a problem that might look like a tangled mess of radicals and trigonometry, but beneath the surface, it is a beautiful, elegant dance of algebraic simplification. We are tasked with evaluating the limit:
x→0lim2−1+cosxsin2x
When you first look at this, it is natural to feel a bit overwhelmed. But remember, every complex limit is just a puzzle waiting for the right key.
The First Step
Identifying the Trap
Our journey begins with the most fundamental rule of limits: direct substitution. When we plug x=0 into our expression, the numerator becomes sin2(0)=0.
The denominator becomes 2−1+cos(0)=2−2=0. We have arrived at the classic 00 indeterminate form.
This is not a dead end; it is a signal. It tells us that there is a hidden factor causing this zero, and our job is to uncover it and cancel it out.
The Strategy
The Power of the Conjugate
Look at the denominator: 2−1+cosx. Those square roots are the source of our trouble.
In the JEE toolkit, when you see radicals in a limit, your best friend is rationalization. We need to multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, which is (2+1+cosx).
By doing this, we are essentially multiplying by 1, so we do not change the value of the expression, but we completely transform its structure. The denominator now becomes a difference of squares:
(2)2−(1+cosx)2=2−(1+cosx)=1−cosx
Suddenly, the radicals have vanished, and we are left with a much cleaner expression:
x→0lim1−cosxsin2x⋅(2+1+cosx)
The Trigonometric Bridge
Now, we are staring at 1−cosx in the denominator. This is a massive red flag in trigonometry.
Whenever you see 1−cosx, you should immediately think of the half-angle identity: 1−cosx=2sin2(2x). This is the key that will unlock the cancellation.
We also know that sinx=2sin(2x)cos(2x). Squaring both sides gives us:
sin2x=4sin2(2x)cos2(2x)
Now, look at what we have created. We have sin2(2x) in both the numerator and the denominator. This is the 'zero-maker' we were looking for!
The Grand Cancellation
Let us assemble our new expression:
x→0lim2sin2(2x)4sin2(2x)cos2(2x)(2+1+cosx)
The sin2(2x) terms cancel out perfectly. The constants 4 and 2 simplify to 2. We are left with the expression:
2cos2(2x)(2+1+cosx)
The indeterminate form is gone. The fear is gone. Now, we simply substitute x=0.
We get 2⋅cos2(0)⋅(2+1+cos(0)). Since cos(0)=1, this becomes:
2⋅(1)2⋅(2+1+1)=2⋅(2+2)=2⋅(22)=42
And there it is. The final answer is 42.
You see, the problem was never about being difficult; it was about being patient. By systematically applying the conjugate and the half-angle identities, we peeled back the layers of the problem until the truth was revealed. Keep this mindset for your next challenge, and you will be unstoppable.