Analyzing the Inner Core
We begin our journey at the very heart of the function: the innermost expression, ∣x−3∣. Imagine you are standing on the Cartesian plane.
The function g(x)=∣x−3∣ is the classic V-shape, a fundamental geometric object. Its vertex sits precisely at x=3.
At x=3, the function changes its behavior abruptly. To the left of 3, the slope is −1; to the right, it is 1. This sudden shift in slope is the definition of a sharp corner, and in the world of calculus, a sharp corner means the function is not differentiable.
Thus, we have identified our first member of the set S: x=3.
The Transformation
Flipping and Shifting
Now, we layer the function. We look at h(x)=2−∣x−3∣.
Think of this as a transformation. The negative sign in front of the modulus flips our V-shape upside down, creating an inverted V.
Then, the constant 2 shifts this entire inverted V upwards by two units. The vertex, which was at (3,0), has now migrated to (3,2).
The Reflection
The Outer Modulus
This is where the magic happens. We apply the outermost modulus: f(x)=∣2−∣x−3∣∣.
An outer modulus acts as a mirror. It takes any part of the graph that has dipped below the x-axis and reflects it upwards, making it positive.
Our inverted V, which had tails extending downwards to negative infinity, now has those tails flipped up. This creates a W-like shape.
Where the graph crosses the x-axis, it creates new sharp corners. These are the roots of the equation:
Solving this, we find ∣x−3∣=2, which leads us to two cases: x−3=2 (so x=5) and x−3=−2 (so x=1).
These are our new points of non-differentiability. Our set S is now complete: S={1,3,5}.
The Final Calculation
The Composite Dance
Now that we have our set S, we calculate the sum of f(f(x)) for each x in S.
For
x=1:
f(1)=∣2−∣1−3∣∣=∣2−2∣=0
f(f(1))=f(0)=∣2−∣0−3∣∣=∣2−3∣=1
For
x=3:
f(3)=∣2−∣3−3∣∣=∣2−0∣=2
f(f(3))=f(2)=∣2−∣2−3∣∣=∣2−1∣=1
For
x=5:
f(5)=∣2−∣5−3∣∣=∣2−2∣=0
f(f(5))=f(0)=∣2−∣0−3∣∣=∣2−3∣=1
The Conclusion
A Beautiful Symmetry
We have arrived at the final step. We sum these values: 1+1+1=3.
It is truly elegant how the complexity of the function collapses into such a clean, simple integer. The final answer is 3.