Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing before a complex equation, one that seems to have too many moving parts. You see ∣x∣2−2∣x∣+∣λ−3∣=0.
It looks intimidating, doesn't it? But here is the secret of the JEE Advanced: most complex-looking problems are just simple structures wearing a disguise. Let's peel back the layers.
The Quadratic Transformation
First, notice the structure. We have ∣x∣2 and −2∣x∣. This is the classic signature of a quadratic expression waiting to be completed.
If we treat ∣x∣ as a single entity—let's call it u—the equation becomes u2−2u+∣λ−3∣=0. Suddenly, the fog clears.
We can complete the square by adding and subtracting 1. This transforms our equation into:
Rearranging this, we get:
This is the heart of the problem. Because the left side is a perfect square, it must be greater than or equal to zero.
Therefore, the right side, 1−∣λ−3∣, must also be non-negative. This gives us a crucial constraint:
This simple inequality tells us that λ is trapped in the interval [2,4].
The Power of Integer Constraints
Now, we introduce the most important constraint: x is an integer. If x is an integer, then ∣x∣ is an integer, and consequently, (∣x∣−1) must be an integer.
Let k=∣x∣−1. Our equation becomes:
Since k is an integer, k2 must be a perfect square integer. But look at the right side: 1−∣λ−3∣.
Since ∣λ−3∣≥0, the maximum value of the right side is 1. So, k2 can only be 0 or 1.
This is the breakthrough! We have reduced an infinite set of possibilities down to just two manageable cases.
Case Analysis
The Final Descent
In Case 1, we set k2=0. This implies (∣x∣−1)2=0, so ∣x∣=1, which gives x=1 or x=−1.
Substituting this back, we find 1−∣λ−3∣=0, leading to ∣λ−3∣=1, so λ=4 or λ=2.
Calculating x+λ for these pairs, we get values:
1+4=5, −1+4=3, 1+2=3, and −1+2=1.
In Case 2, we set k2=1. This implies (∣x∣−1)2=1, so ∣x∣−1=±1.
This gives ∣x∣=2 or ∣x∣=0. Solving for x, we get x=2,−2,0.
Substituting back, we find 1−∣λ−3∣=1, which means ∣λ−3∣=0, so λ=3.
Calculating x+λ here, we get:
2+3=5, −2+3=1, and 0+3=3.
The Conclusion
When we gather all our results, the set S is simply {1,3,5}.
The largest element is clearly 5.
You see? By breaking the problem into logical, bite-sized pieces—completing the square, respecting the integer constraint, and testing the cases—we didn't just solve the problem; we mastered it. Keep this mindset, and no equation will ever be too daunting again.