Animated Solution for Mathematics - Quadratic Equations: The number of distinct real solutions of the equation x∣x+4∣+3∣x+2∣+10=0 is
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
The Equation
Given equation: x∣x+4∣+3∣x+2∣+10=0
Objective: Find the number of distinct real solutions.
Strategy: Analyze the equation by breaking it into cases based on the critical points of the absolute value terms.
Critical Points
Critical points occur where the terms inside the modulus are zero:
1. x+4=0⇒x=−4
2. x+2=0⇒x=−2
Defining Intervals
These points define three intervals:
1. x≥−2
2. −4≤x<−2
3. x<−4
Case 1: x≥−2
For x≥−2:
∣x+4∣=x+4
∣x+2∣=x+2
Solving Case 1
Equation: x(x+4)+3(x+2)+10=0
Simplify: x2+4x+3x+6+10=0⇒x2+7x+16=0
Discriminant D=72−4(1)(16)=49−64=−15
Since D<0, there are no real roots in this interval.
Case 2: −4≤x<−2
For −4≤x<−2:
∣x+4∣=x+4
∣x+2∣=−(x+2)
Solving Case 2
Equation: x(x+4)−3(x+2)+10=0
Simplify: x2+4x−3x−6+10=0⇒x2+x+4=0
Discriminant D=12−4(1)(4)=1−16=−15
Since D<0, there are no real roots in this interval.
Case 3: x<−4
For x<−4:
∣x+4∣=−(x+4)
∣x+2∣=−(x+2)
Solving Case 3
Equation: −x(x+4)−3(x+2)+10=0
Simplify: −x2−4x−3x−6+10=0
Result: −x2−7x+4=0⇒x2+7x−4=0
Roots of Case 3
Solve x2+7x−4=0 using quadratic formula:
x=2a−b±D
D=72−4(1)(−4)=49+16=65
Roots: x=2−7±65
Validating Roots
Approximate 65≈8.06
Root 1: x=2−7+8.06≈0.53 (Rejected as x>−4)
Root 2: x=2−7−8.06≈−7.53 (Accepted as x<−4)
Final Conclusion
Case 1 (x≥−2): 0 solutions
Case 2 (−4≤x<−2): 0 solutions
Case 3 (x<−4): 1 solution (x=2−7−65)
Total number of distinct real solutions = 1
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Solution of Quadratic Equations
Solution Diagram
The Art of the Absolute Value
Unlocking the Equation
Welcome, future engineers! Today, we are going to demystify a problem that often intimidates students: the absolute value equation. When you see bars like ∣x+4∣, your brain might instinctively panic, wondering how to handle the non-linearity.
But I want you to shift your perspective. Don't see these bars as obstacles; see them as hinges. They are the points where the function changes its personality. Our goal is to map out these personality changes and find where the function finally hits zero.
Phase 1
The Map of Critical Points
Before we touch a single variable, we must understand the landscape. The equation given is:
x∣x+4∣+3∣x+2∣+10=0
The hinges are the values of x that make the expressions inside the modulus zero. Setting x+4=0 gives us x=−4, and setting x+2=0 gives us x=−2.
These two points, x=−4 and x=−2, are the borders of our three distinct regions. Imagine standing on a number line: to the right of −2, everything is positive; between −4 and −2, the world is mixed; and to the left of −4, everything is negative. We are going to explore these three realms one by one.
Phase 2
The First Two Realms (The Search for Roots)
Let us start with the rightmost region: x≥−2. In this zone, both x+4 and x+2 are non-negative. The modulus bars are essentially invisible, and we are left with a simple quadratic:
x(x+4)+3(x+2)+10=0
Expanding this, we get x2+4x+3x+6+10=0, which simplifies to x2+7x+16=0. Now, we check the discriminant, D=b2−4ac:
D=72−4(1)(16)=49−64=−15
Since D<0, the parabola never touches the x-axis. There are no solutions here.
Moving to the middle region, −4≤x<−2, the personality of the function shifts. Here, x+4 is still positive, but x+2 is negative. We must flip the sign of the second term:
x(x+4)−3(x+2)+10=0
Expanding this, we get x2+4x−3x−6+10=0, leading to x2+x+4=0. Again, checking the discriminant: D=12−4(1)(4)=1−16=−15. Another negative discriminant! It seems the function is playing hard to get.
Phase 3
The Breakthrough in the Leftmost Realm
Finally, we arrive at the leftmost region: x<−4. Here, both terms are negative, so both modulus bars must flip their signs:
−x(x+4)−3(x+2)+10=0
Let us expand this carefully: −x2−4x−3x−6+10=0. Combining like terms, we get −x2−7x+4=0. To make this look friendly, multiply by −1:
x2+7x−4=0
This is a quadratic we can solve! Using the quadratic formula, x=2a−b±D, where D=72−4(1)(−4)=49+16=65. Our roots are:
x=2−7±65
Phase 4
The Reality Check
We have two potential candidates: x1=2−7+65 and x2=2−7−65. Since 65≈8.06, our roots are approximately 0.53 and −7.53.
Recall our constraint for this region: x<−4.
The root 0.53 is clearly greater than −4, so we must reject it. The root −7.53 is indeed less than −4. It is a valid solution.
Conclusion
The Elegance of Logic
After traversing all three regions, we found that the first two regions yielded no solutions, and the third region yielded exactly one. The beauty of this problem lies not just in the algebra, but in the systematic elimination of possibilities.
We didn't guess; we mapped the function's behavior and let the math guide us to the truth. The total number of distinct real solutions is 1. Keep this methodical approach in your toolkit, and no equation will ever be able to hide its solutions from you!