The Symphony of Piecewise Functions
Decoding the Greatest Integer Trap
My dear student, welcome to a problem that tests not just your calculation skills, but your ability to visualize the behavior of functions. We are looking at f(x)=[4x](x−41)2(x−21).
At first glance, it looks like a standard polynomial, but that [4x]—the Greatest Integer Function—is a wolf in sheep's clothing. It is the heartbeat of this problem, dictating when the function changes its personality. Let us peel back the layers together.
Phase 1
The Anatomy of the Function
The Greatest Integer Function [4x] is a step function. It remains constant until 4x hits an integer, at which point it jumps to the next value.
In the interval (0,1), 4x becomes an integer exactly when x=41,21,and 43. These are our critical junction points. We define our function piecewise as follows:
For x∈(0,41), [4x]=0, so f(x)=0.
For x∈[41,21), [4x]=1, so f(x)=(x−41)2(x−21).
For x∈[21,43), [4x]=2, so f(x)=2(x−41)2(x−21).
For x∈[43,1), [4x]=3, so f(x)=3(x−41)2(x−21).
Phase 2
The Continuity Check
Continuity is about connection. Does the graph break?
At x=41, the Left-Hand Limit (LHL) is 0. The Right-Hand Limit (RHL) is (x−41)2(x−21), which at x=41 is also 0. They meet, so it is continuous.
At x=21, the LHL is (x−41)2(x−21)=0, and the RHL is 2(x−41)2(x−21)=0. Again, they meet, so it is continuous.
At x=43, the LHL is 2(21)2(41)=81, while the RHL is 3(21)2(41)=163. They do not meet, meaning the graph breaks. Thus, the function is discontinuous at x=43.
Phase 3
The Differentiability Dance
A function is differentiable only if the slope from the left matches the slope from the right. Let g(x)=(x−41)2(x−21).
Using the product rule, the derivative is:
g′(x)=(x−41)(3x−45)
At x=41, the Left-Hand Derivative (LHD) is 0 (since f(x)=0 on the left), and the Right-Hand Derivative (RHD) is g′(41)=0. They match, so it is differentiable.
At x=21, the LHD is g′(21)=161, but the RHD is 2⋅g′(21)=81. They do not match. The function has a 'kink' here; it is continuous but not differentiable.
Phase 4
The Hunt for the Minimum
We seek the minimum value. We know the function is 0 in the first interval, positive in the third and fourth, and negative in the second interval ([41,21)).
Therefore, the global minimum must reside in this second interval. We set the derivative g′(x)=0, which yields x=41 and x=125.
Evaluating
f(125) yields:
f(125)=(125−123)2(125−126)=(122)2(−121)=361⋅(−121)=−4321
Since $-\frac{1}{432}
eq -\frac{1}{512}$, the proposed minimum value is false. We have navigated the complexities, analyzed the jumps, and found the truth. Keep this rigor in your heart, and no problem will ever be too daunting.