The Anatomy of a Pathological Function
Welcome, future IITians! Today, we are going to dissect a classic JEE problem that tests your fundamental understanding of calculus. We are looking at a function that seems simple at first glance but hides a fascinating, 'pathological' behavior at a specific point.
Let's dive into the world of the function defined as:
f(x)={(x−1)sinx−11,0,xeq1x=1
Phase 1
The Envelope of Oscillation
Imagine you are standing on the coordinate plane. For any $x
eq 1$, our function is the product of a linear term (x−1) and an oscillating term sinx−11.
The linear term (x−1) acts as an 'envelope.' As x approaches 1, the value of (x−1) shrinks toward zero. This forces the entire function to be 'squeezed' between the lines y=(x−1) and y=−(x−1).
Even though the sine function is oscillating wildly, the (x−1) term dampens these oscillations, forcing the function to pass through the origin (1,0). This is why the function is continuous at x=1. But does continuity imply differentiability? Let's find out.
Phase 2
The Battle at x=1
To check if f(x) is differentiable at x=1, we cannot simply differentiate the expression. We must return to the bedrock of calculus: the definition of the derivative.
The derivative f′(1) exists if and only if the limit limh→0hf(1+h)−f(1) exists and is finite. Let's substitute our function into this limit. Since f(1)=0, the expression becomes:
Rf′(1)=h→0limh(1+h−1)sin1+h−11−0
Simplifying the numerator, we get hsinh1. Now, look at the beauty of the algebra: the h in the numerator and the h in the denominator cancel out perfectly!
Here is where the trap lies. As h→0, the argument h1 approaches infinity. The sine of infinity does not settle down to a single value; it oscillates infinitely fast between −1 and 1.
Because the limit does not approach a unique, finite value, the derivative at x=1 simply does not exist. The function is continuous, but it is not differentiable.
Phase 3
Smooth Sailing at x=0
Now, let's contrast this with the point x=0. Unlike x=1, the point x=0 is far from the singularity. The function is perfectly well-behaved here.
We can use the standard rules of differentiation, specifically the Product Rule. Let f(x)=(x−1)sinx−11. Applying the product rule, we get:
f′(x)=dxd(x−1)⋅sinx−11+(x−1)⋅dxd(sinx−11)
Using the chain rule on the second term, the derivative of sinx−11 is cosx−11⋅(−(x−1)21). Substituting this back, we get:
f′(x)=1⋅sinx−11+(x−1)⋅cosx−11⋅(−(x−1)21)
Simplifying the second term, the (x−1) in the numerator cancels with one factor of (x−1) in the denominator, leaving us with:
f′(x)=sinx−11−x−11cosx−11
This formula is valid for all $x
eq 1$. Since x=0 is not 1, we can safely plug it in:
f′(0)=sin−11−−11cos−11=−sin(1)+cos(1)
Since cos(1)−sin(1) is a unique, finite real number, the derivative exists at x=0.
Conclusion
We have successfully navigated the treacherous waters of this piecewise function. We found that while the function is continuous everywhere, the infinite oscillation at x=1 destroys the possibility of a unique tangent line, making it non-differentiable at that point.
However, at x=0, the function is perfectly smooth. This confirms that f is differentiable at x=0 but not at x=1. Keep this distinction in mind—differentiability is a local property, and it demands much more than just continuity!