Analyzing the Strategic Battlefield
Imagine you are a defense strategist tasked with ensuring a target is destroyed. You have a missile system with a success probability of p=0.75, or 43.
To guarantee the target is obliterated, you need at least three successful hits. The question is: how many missiles must you fire to ensure a success probability of at least 0.95?
We model this using the Binomial Distribution, where X∼B(n,0.75).
The Power of the Complement
When we face the condition P(X≥3)≥0.95, our intuition might suggest calculating the probability of 3 hits, 4 hits, 5 hits, and so on. However, since we do not know n, this approach leads to an algebraic loop.
Instead, we use the Complement Rule. The total probability space sums to 1, so the probability of getting 3 or more hits is simply 1 minus the probability of getting fewer than 3 hits.
Mathematically, we have:
P(X≥3)=1−P(X<3)
Our condition becomes
1−P(X<3)≥0.95, which simplifies to:
P(X<3)≤0.05
Now, we only need to evaluate the cases where we fail to achieve the required hits: X=0, X=1, and X=2.
The Algebraic Siege
We apply the
Binomial Probability formula:
P(X=r)=(rn)prqn−r
For
r=0,1,2, with
p=43 and
q=41, the inequality becomes:
(0n)(41)n+(1n)(43)1(41)n−1+(2n)(43)2(41)n−2≤0.05
Factoring out the common term
4n1, the expression simplifies to:
4n1[(0n)+(1n)(3)+(2n)(32)]≤201
Expanding the combinations where
(0n)=1,
(1n)=n, and
(2n)=2n(n−1), we obtain:
4n1[1+3n+29n(n−1)]≤201
The Final Breakthrough
Simplifying the numerator to
9n2−3n+2 and adjusting the denominator, we arrive at the inequality:
2⋅4n9n2−3n+2≤201⇒4n9n2−3n+2≤101
Now, we test integer values for n:
For
n=5:
10249(25)−3(5)+2=1024212≈0.207
Since
0.207>0.1, we require more firepower.
For
n=6:
40969(36)−3(6)+2=4096308≈0.075
Since
0.075≤0.1, the condition is satisfied.
We have found our answer: it takes 6 missiles to cross the threshold of reliability.