Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, fellow traveler on the path to JEE mastery! Today, we are going to unravel a problem that, at first glance, seems like a simple counting exercise but is actually a masterclass in mathematical transformation.
We are tasked with finding the number of strictly increasing functions f from the set A={1,2,3,4,5,6} to the set B={1,2,3,…,9} such that $f(i)
eq i$ for all i∈A.
The 'strictly increasing' rule implies f(1)<f(2)<f(3)<f(4)<f(5)<f(6). This means that once we choose six distinct values from the codomain, there is only one way to arrange them to satisfy the increasing condition.
The Forbidden Zone
Let us visualize the constraint. For any strictly increasing function on integers, the minimum value an element can take is its index, so f(i)≥i.
The problem explicitly states that $f(i)
eq i$. Since f(i) must be at least i and cannot be i, it must satisfy the condition f(i)≥i+1.
This shift in the lower bound is the key to unlocking the problem. We have effectively moved from a constrained set to a more manageable range.
The Elegant Transformation
Let us define a new function h(i)=f(i)−i. If f(i)≥i+1, then f(i)−i≥1, which implies h(i)≥1.
Regarding monotonicity, since f is strictly increasing, we know f(i+1)≥f(i)+1. Subtracting i+1 from both sides yields:
f(i+1)−(i+1)≥f(i)−i⇒h(i+1)≥h(i)
Our new function h is non-decreasing. We have transformed the problem into finding the number of sequences satisfying:
1≤h(1)≤h(2)≤h(3)≤h(4)≤h(5)≤h(6)
Since the maximum value in our codomain is 9, we have f(6)≤9. Consequently, h(6)=f(6)−6≤9−6=3. Our sequence is bounded by:
1≤h(1)≤h(2)≤h(3)≤h(4)≤h(5)≤h(6)≤3
Final Calculation
We need to choose 6 values for h(i) from the set {1,2,3} such that they are non-decreasing. This is a classic combinations with repetition problem.
We are choosing r=6 items from n=3 types. The formula for combinations with repetition is given by (rn+r−1). Substituting our values:
Using the symmetry property (rn)=(n−rn), we calculate:
The total number of functions that satisfy the given conditions is 28. By transforming the problem, we stripped away the complexity to reveal the elegant structure underneath.