Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, fellow traveler on the path to JEE excellence. Today, we are not just solving an inequality; we are embarking on a journey through the logical architecture of logarithms. The problem before us is:
It looks intimidating, but in mathematics, fear is just a lack of structure. Let us build that structure together.
The Gatekeepers of the Domain
Before we touch a single variable, we must respect the 'Gatekeepers'. For logg(x)f(x) to be defined, three conditions must be satisfied simultaneously:
1. The argument f(x) must be strictly positive: f(x)>0.
2. The base g(x) must be strictly positive: g(x)>0.
3. The base g(x) cannot be unity: $g(x)
eq 1$.
For our base, x+27>0 implies x>−27. Furthermore, $x + \frac{7}{2}
eq 1$ implies $x
eq -\frac{5}{2}$.
The argument (2x−3x−7)2 is a perfect square, so it is always non-negative. It is zero when x=7 and undefined when 2x−3=0, or x=23. Thus, our domain is the entire real line, excluding {−3.5,−2.5,1.5,7}.
The Fork in the Road
The behavior of a logarithm depends entirely on its base. We must split our analysis into two distinct cases.
Case I: The Shrinking Base (0<base<1)
When the base is between 0 and 1, the function is strictly decreasing, and the inequality sign must flip. Our base x+27 is between 0 and 1 when −3.5<x<−2.5.
In this region, the inequality transforms into:
(2x−3x−7)2≤(x+27)0⇒(2x−3x−7)2≤1
Testing the only integer in this range, x=−3, we find the argument becomes (−9−10)2≈1.23. Since 1.23 is not less than or equal to 1, Case I yields no solutions.
The Expanding Base and the Wavy Curve
Case II: The Growing Base (base>1)
When the base is greater than 1, the function is increasing, and the inequality sign remains unchanged. This occurs when x>−2.5. Our inequality becomes:
To solve this, we bring the 1 to the left and use the difference of squares:
(2x−3x−7−1)(2x−3x−7+1)≥0
Subcase A: 2x−3x−7≥1. Simplifying leads to 2x−3x+4≤0. Using the Wavy Curve method, the solution is x∈[−4,1.5). Intersecting this with our Case II condition (x>−2.5), we get x∈(−2.5,1.5).
Subcase B: 2x−3x−7≤−1. Simplifying leads to 2x−33x−10≤0. Using the Wavy Curve method, the solution is x∈(1.5,310]. Since this entire interval is greater than −2.5, it is fully valid.
The Final Tally
We have arrived at the finish line. Our valid intervals are (−2.5,1.5) and (1.5,310].
Counting the integers:
- In (−2.5,1.5), the integers are {−2,−1,0,1} (4 values).
- In (1.5,3.33], the integers are {2,3} (2 values).
Adding them together, 4+2=6. We have found 6 integral solutions.