Multiply the entire equation by 4 to clear denominators:
3t3+4t2−5t=2
Form the Cubic Equation
Rearrange into standard form f(t)=0:
3t3+4t2−5t−2=0
We now need to find the roots of this cubic polynomial.
Find the First Root by Inspection
Test small integer values for t.
Try t=1: 3(1)3+4(1)2−5(1)−2=3+4−5−2=0
Since f(1)=0, t=1 is a root.
Therefore, (t−1) is a factor.
Factorize the Cubic Polynomial
Divide 3t3+4t2−5t−2 by (t−1).
Result: (t−1)(3t2+7t+2)=0
Factorize the quadratic: 3t2+6t+t+2=3t(t+2)+1(t+2)
Final factored form: (t−1)(t+2)(3t+1)=0
Identify all Roots for t
Setting each factor to zero gives the roots for t:
t−1=0⇒t=1
t+2=0⇒t=−2
3t+1=0⇒t=−31
Back-substitute to find x
Recall t=log2x, which means x=2t.
For t=1: x=21=2
For t=−2: x=2−2=41
For t=−31: x=2−31=321
Conclusion and Nature of Roots
The solutions are x={2,41,2−31}.
There are exactly three solutions, all of which are real.
The solution 2−31 is irrational.
Therefore, options (A), (B), and (C) are correct.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Logarithmic Equations and Inequalities
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Setup
The given equation is:
x43(log2x)2+log2x−45=2
At first glance, this is intimidating because the variable x appears in both the base and a complex quadratic expression in the exponent. This is the classic 'Variable Trap'.
In algebra, when you see a variable in the exponent, your instinct should immediately scream 'Logarithm!'. The logarithm is the only tool in our arsenal capable of pulling an exponent down to ground level.
The Key
Applying the Logarithm
We notice the exponent contains log2x. This is a massive hint. If we apply log2 to both sides of the equation, we can invoke the power rule: loga(bc)=cloga(b).
By taking log2 of both sides, the entire exponent jumps down to become a multiplier. The left side transforms from an exponential nightmare into a product:
(43(log2x)2+log2x−45)log2x=log2(2)
On the right side, we have log2(2). Since 2=21/2, this simplifies beautifully to 21. We have successfully tamed the beast.
The Bridge
Substitution
Now, we have an equation that looks like this:
(43(log2x)2+log2x−45)log2x=21
Writing log2x repeatedly is not just tedious; it is a recipe for transcription errors. Let us introduce a bridge: the substitution t=log2x.
Suddenly, the equation becomes a familiar algebraic friend:
(43t2+t−45)t=21
By distributing the t and multiplying the entire equation by 4 to clear the fractions, we arrive at a clean, elegant cubic equation:
3t3+4t2−5t−2=0
The Cubic Dance
We are now in the realm of polynomials. To solve 3t3+4t2−5t−2=0, we start with the method of inspection. Testing small integers is a classic JEE strategy.
If we test t=1, we get 3(1)3+4(1)2−5(1)−2=3+4−5−2=0. Success! Since t=1 is a root, (t−1) must be a factor.
Through polynomial division, we factor the cubic into (t−1)(3t2+7t+2)=0. Further factoring the quadratic gives us:
(t−1)(t+2)(3t+1)=0
The roots for t are 1,−2, and −31.
The Final Reveal
We are almost home. We have the values for t, but the question asks for x. We must reverse our substitution using x=2t.
For t=1, x=21=2.
For t=−2, x=2−2=41.
For t=−31, x=2−1/3=321.
We have found three distinct, real solutions: x∈{2,41,321}. This problem is a perfect example of how a terrifying exponential equation can be dismantled, piece by piece, into a solvable polynomial.