The Art of Seeing Patterns
Welcome, fellow traveler, to the beautiful world of logarithmic equations. When you first look at an equation like
log(2x+3)(6x2+23x+21)=4−log(3x+7)(4x2+12x+9)
it is natural to feel a surge of intimidation. It looks like a mess of quadratics and logs.
But here is the secret of the JEE Advanced topper: never start by calculating. Start by observing. The problem is not asking you to brute-force your way through; it is asking you to see the hidden symmetry.
Phase 1
The Hidden Factorization
Look closely at the arguments. We have 6x2+23x+21 and 4x2+12x+9. If you try to solve this using standard log expansion, you will be lost in a forest of complexity.
Instead, let us factorize. The first argument, 6x2+23x+21, splits beautifully into (2x+3)(3x+7).
The second argument, 4x2+12x+9, is a perfect square: (2x+3)2. Do you see it now? The bases of our logarithms are (2x+3) and (3x+7). The arguments are composed of these exact same factors. This is not a coincidence; it is a design.
Phase 2
The Logarithmic Dance
Now that we have revealed the structure, let us rewrite the equation:
log(2x+3)((2x+3)(3x+7))=4−log(3x+7)(2x+3)2
Using the product rule, logb(mn)=logbm+logbn, the left side becomes log(2x+3)(2x+3)+log(2x+3)(3x+7). Since logbb=1, this simplifies to 1+log(2x+3)(3x+7).
On the right side, we use the power rule, logb(mn)=nlogbm, to bring that exponent of 2 down, giving us 4−2log(3x+7)(2x+3). The equation is now:
1+log(2x+3)(3x+7)=4−2log(3x+7)(2x+3)
Phase 3
The Substitution Strategy
We are staring at two log terms that are reciprocals of each other. Let y=log(2x+3)(3x+7). By the change of base property, log(3x+7)(2x+3)=y1.
Our equation transforms into the elegant algebraic form:
Multiplying by y gives us y+y2=4y−2, which rearranges into the quadratic y2−3y+2=0. Factoring this gives (y−1)(y−2)=0, leading to y=1 or y=2.
Phase 4
The Domain Minefield
This is where the battle is won or lost. We have two cases for y.
Case 1: log(2x+3)(3x+7)=1 leads to 3x+7=2x+3, or x=−4. But wait! Check the base: 2(−4)+3=−5. A negative base is undefined. Rejected.
Case 2: log(2x+3)(3x+7)=2 leads to 3x+7=(2x+3)2, which simplifies to 4x2+9x+2=0. Factoring this gives (4x+1)(x+2)=0, so x=−41 or x=−2.
Checking x=−2 in the base 3x+7 gives 3(−2)+7=1. A base of 1 is undefined. Rejected. Finally, checking x=−41, we find valid bases.
The only survivor is x=−41. You have conquered the problem not just with algebra, but with mathematical rigor.