Animated Solution for Mathematics - Sequence and Series: Statement-1 : For every natural number n≥2,11+21+⋯+n1>n. Statement-2 : For every natural number n≥2,n(n+1)<n+1.
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Analyzing the Statements
Statement-1: 11+21+⋯+n1>n
Statement-2: n(n+1)<n+1
We need to verify both statements for n≥2 and check if Statement-2 explains Statement-1.
Evaluating Statement-2
Let's test the inequality: n(n+1)<n+1
Since n≥2, both sides are strictly positive.
We can safely square both sides to remove the square root.
Squaring Both Sides
Squaring yields: n(n+1)<(n+1)2
Expand the right side or simply divide by (n+1).
Since n≥2, (n+1) is strictly positive, so the inequality sign remains unchanged.
Simplifying the Inequality
Dividing by (n+1): n<n+1
Subtracting n from both sides gives 0<1, which is universally true.
Therefore, Statement-2 is True.
What does Statement-2 imply?
We proved n(n+1)<n+1
Divide by n+1: n<n+1
This proves that the square root function is strictly increasing.
Consequently, n1 is strictly decreasing.
Visualizing the Sum
Let's look at Statement-1: S=∑k=1nk1
We can visualize each term k1 as a rectangle of width 1 and height k1.
The total sum S is the total area of these rectangles.
The Total Area
Let's draw the rectangles for k=1,2,3,…,n.
Because k1 is decreasing, each subsequent rectangle is shorter.
The last rectangle has a height of n1.
Bounding the Sum
Notice that every rectangle is taller than or equal to the last one.
k1≥n1 for all k≤n.
Let's draw a horizontal line at the minimum height, y=n1.
Area of the Bounding Rectangle
Imagine a large rectangle with this minimum height n1 spanning across all n bars.
The width of this combined rectangle is exactly n.
Calculating the Minimum Area
The area of this red bounding rectangle is: Width×Height
Area=n×n1
Simplifying this gives: Area=n
Comparing the Areas
The sum of the green bars (Statement-1) clearly contains the red rectangle and has extra area above it.
Therefore, ∑k=1nk1>n.
Statement-1 is True.
Is Statement-2 the correct explanation?
To prove Statement-1, we relied on the fact that k1≥n1.
This requires k≤n, meaning the square root function is increasing.
Statement-2 (n(n+1)<n+1⟹n<n+1) is exactly the formal proof of this increasing property!
Final Answer
Both statements are True.
Statement-2 provides the foundational monotonic property needed to prove Statement-1.
Thus, Statement-2 is the correct explanation for Statement-1.
Correct Option: 2
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Sum of Special Series
Solution Diagram
The Symphony of Inequalities
A Journey into Monotonicity
Welcome, fellow traveler of the mathematical realm. Today, we are not just solving an inequality; we are peeling back the layers of a beautiful logical structure.
We have two statements, and our mission is to see how they dance together. Let us begin by dissecting the bedrock of this problem: Statement-2.
Phase 1
The Algebraic Bedrock
Statement-2 presents us with the inequality n(n+1)<n+1. At first glance, it looks like a simple algebraic expression, but it holds the key to the entire problem.
Since we are given n≥2, we know that both sides are strictly positive. This is our green light to square both sides without fear of flipping the inequality sign.
When we square both sides, we get:
n(n+1)<(n+1)2
Now, look at the elegance of this simplification. We can divide both sides by (n+1)—which is perfectly safe because n+1 is positive—and we are left with n<n+1.
This is a universal truth! It is the most fundamental property of natural numbers. Thus, Statement-2 is undeniably true.
But more importantly, this inequality implies that n<n+1, which tells us that the square root function is strictly increasing. This is the 'soul' of the problem.
Phase 2
Visualizing the Sum
Now, let us turn our gaze to Statement-1: ∑k=1nk1>n. This looks like a daunting sum, but let us transform it into a picture.
Imagine a coordinate plane. For each term k1, let us draw a rectangle with a width of 1 and a height of k1. The total area of these rectangles is exactly our sum:
S=k=1∑nk1
As k increases, the height of our rectangles, k1, decreases. This is where the magic happens.
Because the square root function is strictly increasing (as we proved in Statement-2), its reciprocal, k1, must be strictly decreasing. This means every rectangle we draw is shorter than the one before it.
The very last rectangle, corresponding to k=n, is the shortest of them all, with a height of n1.
Phase 3
The Geometric Synthesis
Imagine drawing a horizontal dashed line at the height of this shortest rectangle, y=n1. Because every other rectangle is taller than this one, they all extend above this dashed line.
Now, construct a giant rectangle with this minimum height n1 that spans the entire width of our n rectangles. The total width is n, and the height is n1.
The area of this 'bounding' rectangle is simply:
Width×Height=n×n1=n
Since our original green rectangles are all taller than this bounding rectangle, their total area must be strictly greater than n. And there it is! We have geometrically proven that ∑k=1nk1>n.
Conclusion
The Logical Link
So, why is Statement-2 the correct explanation for Statement-1? Because the entire geometric argument relies on the fact that the sequence k1 is decreasing.
And how did we know it was decreasing? Because the square root function is increasing. And how did we prove that? Through the algebraic proof in Statement-2.
The two statements are not just related; they are two sides of the same coin. Both are true, and the second is the foundation upon which the first is built. Keep this perspective, and you will find that even the most complex JEE problems are just stories waiting to be told.