Analyzing the Telescoping Identity
Statement-2 provides the identity:
k=1∑n(k3−(k−1)3)=n3
This is a classic example of a telescoping series. When we expand the summation, we observe the following terms:
For k=1: 13−03
For k=2: 23−13
For k=3: 33−23
As the series progresses, the positive term of one bracket cancels the negative term of the subsequent bracket. This chain reaction continues until only the very first negative term, −03, and the very last positive term, n3, remain. Thus, the sum simplifies to n3, confirming that Statement-2 is true.
Deconstructing the Main Series
Now, let us evaluate the sum
S given in Statement-1:
S=1+(1+2+4)+(4+6+9)+(9+12+16)+⋯+(361+380+400)
By observing the structure of each bracket, we identify a clear pattern. The second term is
12+1⋅2+22, and the third term is
22+2⋅3+32. Generally, the
k-th term
Tk can be expressed as:
Tk=(k−1)2+(k−1)k+k2
Applying the Algebraic Identity
Recall the algebraic identity for the difference of two cubes:
a3−b3=(a−b)(a2+ab+b2)
If we set
a=k and
b=k−1, then
(a−b)=1. Consequently, the expression for
Tk simplifies perfectly:
Tk=k3−(k−1)3
Our series S is the sum of these terms from k=1 to k=20. Note that the first term 1 can be written as 13−03.
Final Calculation
Using the telescoping property proven in Statement-2, the sum of the series is:
S=k=1∑20(k3−(k−1)3)=203
Calculating the final value:
203=8000
The logic is consistent and the derivation is sound. Therefore, Statement-1 is true, and Statement-2 is the correct explanation for the result.