Unraveling the Mathematics of Radioactive Decay
Radioactive decay is one of the most elegant phenomena in physics. It is entirely governed by probability, yet it follows a strict, predictable mathematical law when dealing with large numbers of atoms. In this problem, we are tasked with finding the exact time t when the ratio of daughter nuclei to parent nuclei reaches a specific value.
The Physical Setup
A Decaying into B
Imagine a sealed container. At time t=0, it is filled purely with radioactive nucleus A. There is absolutely no nucleus B present. As the clock ticks, atoms of A undergo radioactive decay and transform into stable atoms of B.
We are given a fascinating piece of information: at some specific time t, the ratio of the number of B atoms to A atoms is 0.3. Mathematically, this is written as:
The Smart Pedagogical Trick
Instead of wrestling with abstract variables like N0 right away, let's use a powerful pedagogical trick. The ratio 0.3 is exactly the same as the fraction 10030.
Let's imagine that at this specific time t, we have exactly 100 atoms of A remaining. To satisfy the ratio, we must have exactly 30 atoms of B formed.
Now, think about the conservation of atoms. Every single atom of B was originally an atom of A. Therefore, the initial number of A atoms at t=0 must be the sum of the atoms that are still A and the atoms that have turned into B:
So, we started with 130 atoms, and at time t, we have 100 atoms of A left.
The Mathematical Translation
Now we bring in the heavy artillery: the radioactive decay law. This law states that the number of undecayed nuclei at any time t is given by:
Let's substitute our assumed numbers into this master equation:
Dividing both sides by 130, we get:
Which simplifies beautifully to:
The Power of Logarithms
To solve for t, we need to get it out of the exponent. First, let's take the reciprocal of both sides to eliminate the negative sign in the exponent. The reciprocal of 1.31 is simply 1.3, and the reciprocal of e−λt is eλt:
Now, we take the natural logarithm (ln or loge) of both sides:
Bringing in the Half-Life
The problem gives us the half-life T, not the decay constant λ. However, we know the fundamental relationship between the two:
Substituting this into our equation gives:
Finally, we rearrange the terms to isolate t:
Since ln is just another notation for loge, we can write our final answer as:
This perfectly matches option (a). By assigning concrete numbers to a ratio, we bypassed messy algebraic fractions and arrived at the solution with absolute clarity!