The Illusion of Average Velocity
Imagine you are tracking a road trip. You know exactly where the car was at 1:00 PM and where it was at 3:00 PM. From this, you can easily calculate the average speed for that two-hour window. But does that tell you how fast the car was going at 1:30 PM? Or where it started at noon?
This problem plays on that exact intuition. It gives us a few concrete data points and tempts us to make sweeping assumptions about the entire journey. Let's break down the physics mathematically and see why we must tread carefully.
Breaking Down the Knowns
We are given two specific snapshots of a particle moving continuously in the positive x-direction:
- At t1=1 s, the position is x1=9 m.
- At t2=3 s, the position is x2=17 m.
The fundamental tool we need here is the formula for average velocity, which is the total displacement divided by the total time taken:
vavg=ΔtΔx=tf−tixf−xi
Let's apply this to the interval [1 s,3 s]:
vavg,1→3=3−117−9=28=4 m/s
So, we know for an absolute fact that between the 1st and 3rd second, the particle covered ground at an average rate of 4 m/s.
Expanding to the Full Journey
The problem provides a crucial piece of information: the average velocity for the entire interval from t=0 s to t=6 s is exactly the same as the average velocity we just calculated.
Therefore, vavg,0→6=4 m/s.
Let's plug this into our average velocity formula for the [0,6] interval:
vavg,0→6=6−0x(6)−x(0)=4
Multiplying both sides by 6, we get:
This equation tells us that the total displacement over the 6 seconds is 24 m.
The Trap of Uniform Motion
Here is where many students make a fatal error. They look at the average velocity of 4 m/s and subconsciously assume the particle is moving with a constant, uniform speed of 4 m/s at every single instant.
If the speed were uniform, the position function would be x(t)=4t+5.
Let's test this:
- x(0)=4(0)+5=5 m
- x(1)=4(1)+5=9 m (Matches given data!)
- x(3)=4(3)+5=17 m (Matches given data!)
- x(6)=4(6)+5=29 m
If this were the only possible motion, then option (a) "It was at x=5 m at t=0 s" would be correct.
But is uniform motion guaranteed? No! The problem only states the particle moves "continuously in the positive x-direction". It could be accelerating, decelerating, or moving erratically as long as it never turns back.
Imagine a different scenario where the particle moves very slowly at first, and then speeds up. What if x(0)=6 m and x(6)=30 m?
The displacement is 30−6=24 m, which perfectly satisfies our equation x(6)−x(0)=24.
There is no physical law preventing the particle from being at x=6 m at t=0, reaching x=9 m at t=1, and so on.
Final Conclusion
Because we have one equation (x(6)−x(0)=24) but two unknown variables (x(6) and x(0)), we have a system with infinitely many valid solutions.
We cannot definitively prove where the particle started, where it ended, or what its average velocity was in the specific [3 s,6 s] sub-interval. Therefore, the only logically sound conclusion is that the information is insufficient to decide.