Imagine a straight highway where three particles—A, B, and C—are lined up and ready to race. Particle A is at the back, B is in the middle, and C is at the front. They all start moving simultaneously with their own constant velocities.
The problem gives us two hypothetical scenarios:
1. If C wasn't there, A would catch up and collide with B at time t1.
2. If B wasn't there, A would catch up and collide with C at time t2.
The ultimate question is: If A wasn't there, what would happen between B and C?
This might seem like a puzzle with missing pieces. We don't know their exact positions or speeds! But physics is beautiful because it allows us to use algebra to uncover hidden truths. Let's break this down step-by-step.
Setting Up the Mathematical Stage
Let's place our particles on an x-axis. Their initial positions are
xA,
xB, and
xC. Because B is between A and C, we know for a fact that:
xA<xB<xC
Let their constant velocities be
vA,
vB, and
vC. Since they move with constant velocity, their position at any time
t is given by the standard kinematic equation:
x(t)=x0+vt
Decoding the Collisions
Let's look at the first clue. A and B collide at
t1. For A to catch B, A must be faster. At the moment of collision, their positions are equal:
xA+vAt1=xB+vBt1
We can rearrange this to find the relative velocity of A with respect to B:
(vA−vB)t1=xB−xA
Let's call the initial distance between A and B as
d1=xB−xA. So, we get:
vA−vB=t1d1
Now, let's apply the exact same logic to the second clue. A and C collide at
t2.
xA+vAt2=xC+vCt2
Let the initial distance between A and C be
d2=xC−xA. This gives us:
vA−vC=t2d2
Crucial Observation: Because C starts further ahead than B, the distance d2 is strictly greater than d1 (d2>d1).
The Ultimate Showdown
B vs. C
Now, we remove A from the picture. Will B and C collide?
For B to catch up to C, the trailing particle (B) must be moving faster than the leading particle (C). The mathematical condition for their collision is simply:
vB>vC
But how do we compare
vB and
vC when we only know their velocities relative to A? We use a clever algebraic trick! We can express the relative velocity of B and C using the equations we already derived:
vB−vC=(vA−vC)−(vA−vB)
Substitute the fractions we found earlier:
vB−vC=t2d2−t1d1
For B and C to collide, this difference must be positive. So, we need:
t2d2>t1d1
Analyzing the Cases
The options in the question ask us to consider two cases based on the times t1 and t2.
Case 1: What if t2≤t1?
Let's look at our fractions. We already know that the numerator d2 is greater than d1. If the denominator t2 is smaller than or equal to t1, then the fraction t2d2 is getting a "double boost"—it has a larger numerator AND a smaller denominator!
Mathematically, it is guaranteed that:
t2d2>t1d1
This means vB is definitely greater than vC. Particles B and C MUST collide.
But when? Let's find the collision time
t.
t=vB−vCd2−d1
If we subtract t2 from t and simplify, we find that t−t2≤0, which means t≤t2. This perfectly matches option (c).
Case 2: What if t2>t1?
Now things get murky. The numerator d2 is larger, which tries to make the fraction bigger. But the denominator t2 is also larger, which tries to make the fraction smaller.
Depending on the exact values, t2d2 could be greater than, equal to, or less than t1d1.
- If it's greater, they collide.
- If it's equal, they move at the exact same speed and stay parallel forever.
- If it's less, C is faster and pulls away from B.
Therefore, if t2>t1, particles B and C may or may not collide. This matches option (a).
The Takeaway
This problem is a brilliant exercise in abstract kinematic reasoning
By translating physical constraints into algebraic inequalities, we can definitively predict the outcome of a race without knowing a single number!