Analyzing the Setup
To find the negation of the boolean expression p⇔(q⇒p), we must systematically break down the logical operators. The goal is to simplify the expression into its most basic form before applying the negation.
Phase 1
Deconstructing the Implication
Our first step is to simplify the inner bracket, q⇒p. Using the logical identity A⇒B≡∼A∨B, we transform the expression:
Substituting this back into the original expression, we obtain:
Phase 2
The Biconditional Bridge
Next, we address the biconditional operator. We utilize the definition A⇔B≡(A⇒B)∧(B⇒A) to split the expression:
This expansion allows us to analyze the two components independently.
Phase 3
The Tautology Reveal
Let us evaluate the first part: p⇒(∼q∨p). Applying the implication rule again:
Since ∼p∨p is a tautology (T), the expression becomes T∨∼q, which simplifies to True.
Now, we evaluate the second part: (∼q∨p)⇒p. Applying the implication rule:
Using De Morgan's Law, this becomes (q∧∼p)∨p. Applying the distributive law, we get:
Final Calculation
Combining the two parts, the original expression simplifies to T∧(p∨q), which is equivalent to p∨q.
Our final task is to find the negation of this result. By applying De Morgan's Law to p∨q, we arrive at the final answer: