Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, future engineer! Today, we are going to tackle a problem that often intimidates students, but once you peel back the layers, it reveals a beautiful, logical structure. We are dealing with a limit involving cube roots.
In the world of JEE Advanced, the most complex-looking problems often yield to the most fundamental principles.
The Indeterminate Trap
Imagine you are standing on the graph of the function f(x)=(a+2x)1/3−(3x)1/3. As x approaches a, you are trying to find the value of the function.
If you simply plug in x=a, you get (a+2a)1/3−(3a)1/3, which is (3a)1/3−(3a)1/3=0. The same happens in the denominator, resulting in the classic 00 indeterminate form.
This is like a fog that hides the true value of the function. To clear this fog, we use L'Hospital's Rule. Geometrically, this rule tells us that when two functions intersect the x-axis at the same point, the limit of their ratio is simply the ratio of their slopes at that point.
The Calculus Grind
Now, we need to find the slopes. This means we must differentiate. Let's focus on the numerator f(x)=(a+2x)1/3−(3x)1/3.
Applying the power rule and the Chain Rule, we get:
f′(x)=31(a+2x)−2/3⋅2−31(3x)−2/3⋅3
We brought the power down, reduced it by one, and then multiplied by the derivative of the inner function. For (a+2x), the derivative is 2. For (3x), the derivative is 3.
Now, let's do the same for the denominator g(x)=(3a+x)1/3−(4x)1/3:
g′(x)=31(3a+x)−2/3⋅1−31(4x)−2/3⋅4
The Algebraic Cleanup
This is where the magic happens. We evaluate these derivatives at x=a:
f′(a)=31(3a)−2/3⋅2−31(3a)−2/3⋅3=31(3a)−2/3(2−3)=−31(3a)−2/3
g′(a)=31(4a)−2/3⋅1−31(4a)−2/3⋅4=31(4a)−2/3(1−4)=−(4a)−2/3
Notice how the terms simplify? The negative signs cancel out, and we are left with a ratio of powers. When we divide f′(a) by g′(a), the variable a effectively disappears from the ratio.
Final Calculation
The limit is calculated as follows:
Limit=−(4a)−2/3−31(3a)−2/3=31⋅(3a)2/3(4a)2/3=31(34)2/3
We have navigated through the indeterminate form, applied the Chain Rule with precision, and simplified the expression. The final result is: