Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing on the complex plane, a vast, two-dimensional canvas where every point is a complex number z=x+iy. We are given a transformation:
where k>0. This is not just an algebraic expression; it is a mapping that transforms the geometry of the plane. Our mission is to uncover the path defined by the condition Re(u)+Im(u)=1.
The Surgical Procedure
Rationalization
To understand this curve, we must first break u into its real and imaginary parts. We substitute z=x+iy into the expression for u:
u=(x+iy)−ki2(x+iy)+i=x+i(y−k)2x+i(2y+1)
We cannot easily separate the real and imaginary parts with i in the denominator. We perform a surgical procedure: rationalization. We multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, x−i(y−k).
This yields:
u=x2+(y−k)2[2x+i(2y+1)]⋅[x−i(y−k)]
Now, the denominator is purely real. We can extract the real and imaginary parts as follows:
Re(u)=x2+(y−k)22x2+(2y+1)(y−k)
The Emergence of the Circle
The problem gives us the condition Re(u)+Im(u)=1. Substituting our expressions, we have:
x2+(y−k)22x2+(2y+1)(y−k)+x(2k+1)=1
Multiplying both sides by the denominator and expanding, we get:
2x2+2y2−2yk+y−k+2kx+x=x2+y2−2yk+k2
Rearranging these terms, we arrive at the elegant equation:
This is the equation of a circle. We have successfully translated a complex transformation into a familiar geometric shape.
The Intersection and the Final Calculation
The problem states that this circle intersects the y-axis at points P and Q. On the y-axis, the x-coordinate is always zero. Substituting x=0 into our circle equation, we get:
This is a quadratic equation in y. Let its roots be y1 and y2, which represent the y-coordinates of P and Q. We are given that the distance PQ=5, which means ∣y1−y2∣=5.
Using the identity (y1−y2)2=(y1+y2)2−4y1y2 and applying Vieta's relations where y1+y2=−1 and y1y2=−(k2+k), we get:
This simplifies to:
Dividing by 4, we obtain k2+k−6=0. Factoring this, we find (k+3)(k−2)=0, giving k=−3 or k=2.
Since the problem specifies k>0, we reject −3. We conclude that the final answer is k=2.