The Illusion of Sharpness
A Calculus Journey
Welcome, fellow traveler of the mathematical landscape. Today, we are going to dissect a function that, at first glance, looks like a nightmare of sharp corners and jagged edges.
We are looking at the function:
f(x)=∣x−π∣⋅(e∣x∣−1)sin∣x∣
When you see modulus signs, your instinct might be to panic, expecting a graph full of V-shaped kinks. But in JEE Advanced, we don't panic; we investigate. Let's peel back the layers of this function and discover the hidden smoothness beneath.
Phase 1
Identifying the Suspects
Calculus is a detective game. We are looking for points where the function fails to be differentiable.
A function is non-differentiable where it has a 'kink'—a point where the slope changes abruptly. In our function, the modulus terms ∣x∣ and ∣x−π∣ are the prime suspects.
They are defined differently on either side of their roots, x=0 and x=π. These are the only two points where the 'DNA' of our function changes. Everywhere else, it is a product of smooth, well-behaved functions.
So, our mission is clear: we must investigate the behavior of f(x) specifically at x=0 and x=π.
Phase 2
The Origin (x=0)
Let's stand at the origin. As x approaches 0, the term ∣x−π∣ is perfectly well-behaved; it just approaches ∣0−π∣=π. It is a constant, a silent observer that doesn't affect the differentiability.
The real action happens with (e∣x∣−1) and sin∣x∣. Recall your standard limits: for small x, e∣x∣−1≈∣x∣ and sin∣x∣≈∣x∣.
If we substitute these into our function, we get:
f(x)≈π⋅∣x∣⋅∣x∣=π∣x∣2
And here is the magic: ∣x∣2 is exactly x2. The sharp corner of the first ∣x∣ is perfectly neutralized by the second ∣x∣.
The function locally behaves like a smooth parabola y=πx2. A parabola is the definition of smoothness! Its derivative at x=0 is 0. The suspect is cleared; the function is differentiable at x=0.
Phase 3
The π Point (x=π)
Now, let's move to our second suspect, x=π. As x approaches π, the term (e∣x∣−1) approaches (eπ−1), which is just a non-zero constant. Again, it is harmless.
The troublemakers are ∣x−π∣ and sin∣x∣. Since we are near x=π, x is positive, so sin∣x∣=sinx.
Using the trigonometric identity sinx=−sin(x−π), we can see that as x→π, sinx behaves like −(x−π). Now, look at the product: ∣x−π∣⋅−(x−π).
Let h=x−π. The expression becomes −h∣h∣. Just like x∣x∣, the function h∣h∣ is smooth at the origin with a derivative of 0.
It creates a beautiful, inverted, smooth curve with a horizontal tangent. The sharp corner of ∣x−π∣ is once again smoothed out by the linear behavior of the sine term. The second suspect is cleared!
Conclusion
The Empty Set
We have interrogated both suspects. At x=0, the function behaves like a parabola. At x=π, it behaves like a smooth cubic-like curve.
Everywhere else, it is a product of smooth functions. There are no points of non-differentiability.
The set S of points where f(x) is non-differentiable is, quite elegantly, the empty set, ϕ.
Isn't that beautiful? What looked like a jagged, broken path was actually a perfectly smooth journey all along. Keep this intuition in your toolkit: multiplication can be a powerful tool for smoothing out the sharpest of corners. Happy problem solving!