The Mountain Climb
Understanding Monotonicity
Imagine you are standing at the base of a mountain range. You are tasked with walking along a path defined by the function fλ(x)=4λx3−36λx2+36x+48.
The condition is simple but strict: you must never walk downhill. Every step you take must be either level or uphill.
In the language of calculus, this means the slope of your path—the derivative—must never be negative. It must be greater than or equal to zero for every single point x on the real number line.
This is the essence of a monotonically increasing function. It is not just about the function values; it is about the rate of change. Let us begin our journey by finding that rate of change.
Phase 1
The Calculus Bridge
To find the slope, we apply the power rule to our cubic polynomial. Differentiating fλ(x) with respect to x, we get:
fλ′(x)=dxd(4λx3−36λx2+36x+48)
Applying the rule term by term, the 4λx3 becomes 12λx2, the −36λx2 becomes −72λx, and the 36x becomes 36. The constant 48 vanishes, as it contributes nothing to the slope.
We are left with:
To make our analysis cleaner, let us factor out the common 12:
We need this expression to be non-negative for all x∈R. This is where the physics of the graph takes over.
Phase 2
The Quadratic Trap
We are now looking at a quadratic expression: λx2−6λx+3. For this to be non-negative for all x, the parabola must open upwards, and it must not cross the x-axis.
First, for the parabola to open upwards, the leading coefficient must be positive: λ>0.
Second, to ensure it never dips below the x-axis, the discriminant D must be less than or equal to zero. If D were positive, the parabola would cross the axis, creating a region where the slope is negative—and we know that is forbidden on our mountain climb!
So, we set D=b2−4ac≤0:
Expanding this, we get:
Factoring this inequality, we find:
Since we already established that λ>0, we can divide by 12λ without flipping the inequality sign. This leaves us with 3λ−1≤0, or λ≤31.
Combining this with our condition λ>0, we find the valid range for λ is (0,31]. The largest value, our λ∗, is exactly 31.
Phase 3
The Final Evaluation
Now that we have unlocked the value of λ∗=31, we substitute it back into our original function to see the path clearly:
fλ∗(x)=4(31)x3−36(31)x2+36x+48
fλ∗(x)=34x3−12x2+36x+48
The problem asks us to calculate fλ∗(1)+fλ∗(−1). Let us compute these values carefully.
For x=1:
f(1)=34(1)3−12(1)2+36(1)+48=34−12+36+48=34+72
For x=−1:
f(−1)=34(−1)3−12(−1)2+36(−1)+48=−34−12−36+48=−34
When we sum these two results, the beauty of the problem reveals itself. The fractional terms 34 and −34 cancel out perfectly, leaving us with:
And there we have it. Through the rigorous application of calculus and the geometric intuition of parabolas, we have navigated the path and arrived at the summit.
The final answer is 72.