Analyzing the Setup
The given system of equations is:
(2a)lna=(bc)lnb
bln2=alnc
These equations appear complex, but they are designed to be simplified through logarithmic transformation. Our objective is to isolate the variables and solve for the required expression.
The Logarithmic Bridge
To bring the exponents down, we apply the natural logarithm (
ln) to both sides of the equations. Using the power rule
ln(mn)=nlnm, the first equation becomes:
lna⋅ln(2a)=lnb⋅ln(bc)
Expanding this using the product rule
ln(mn)=lnm+lnn, we obtain:
lna(ln2+lna)=lnb(lnb+lnc)
The Substitution Strategy
To simplify the notation, we define the following substitutions:
x=lna, y=lnb, and z=lnc.
The system now transforms into standard algebraic form:
x(ln2+x)=y(y+z)
ln2⋅y=x⋅z
Since
ln2 is a constant, we isolate it from the second equation:
ln2=yxz
The Algebraic Dance
We substitute the expression for
ln2 back into the first equation:
x(yxz+x)=y(y+z)
Distributing
x and multiplying the entire equation by
y to clear the denominator yields:
x2z+x2y=y3+y2z
Rearranging the terms to one side, we get:
y3−x2y+y2z−x2z=0
Grouping the terms allows for factorization:
y(y2−x2)+z(y2−x2)=0
(y2−x2)(y+z)=0
Applying the difference of squares identity, we arrive at:
(y−x)(y+x)(y+z)=0
The Final Reveal
Given that a and b are distinct, we know $x
eq y$, which implies $(y - x)
eq 0$. This leaves us with two possibilities: y+x=0 or y+z=0.
Testing the path
y+z=0, we find
lnb+lnc=0, which implies
ln(bc)=0, or
bc=1. Substituting
z=−y into our expression for
ln2:
ln2=yx(−y)=−x
Since
x=lna, we have
ln2=−lna=ln(a−1), which leads to
a=1/2. We now calculate the final value:
6a+5bc=6(21)+5(1)=3+5=8
The final answer is 8.