Sigma Percentile
JEE Advanced 1984
LEVELBoard

Animated Solution for Mathematics - Basic Mathematics: If is a natural number such that and are distinct primes, then show that .

Visualized Solution

Analyze the Prime Factorization of

  • Given:
  • Where are distinct prime numbers.
  • The exponents are natural numbers.

Apply Natural Logarithm to Both Sides

  • We need to prove an inequality involving .
  • Taking natural logarithm () on both sides:

Use the Logarithm Product Rule

  • Using the property:

Apply the Logarithm Power Rule

  • Using the property:
  • In summation notation:

Establish Constraints on Prime Numbers

  • Since are prime numbers, the smallest possible prime is .
  • Therefore, for all .

Analyze the Logarithmic Inequality

  • The function is a strictly increasing function for .
  • Since , applying preserves the inequality.
  • Thus, .

Establish Constraints on Exponents

  • The exponents are natural numbers.
  • Thus, for all .
  • Multiplying the two inequalities: .
  • Result: .

Sum the Inequalities

  • We have the inequality for each term: .
  • Summing this inequality from to :

Evaluate the Sum and Conclude

  • The right side is a sum of a constant: .
  • From Step 4, the left side is exactly .
  • Substituting these back: .
  • Hence Proved.

The Way Forward

  • Key Takeaway: The number of distinct prime factors provides a lower bound for .
  • Challenge: When does the equality hold?
  • Hint: Consider the case where and .
  • Since primes are distinct, cannot all be . Thus, strict inequality holds for .

The Sigma Insight: Properties of Logarithms

The DNA of Numbers

Imagine you are standing before the vast, infinite landscape of natural numbers. Every single one of them, from the smallest prime to the most gargantuan integer, shares a secret identity. They are all built from the same fundamental bricks: prime numbers.
This is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic. When we write , we are essentially looking at the DNA of the number . Today, we are going to explore how this structure dictates the behavior of the natural logarithm of .

The Logarithmic Transformation

We are tasked with proving that . At first glance, this might seem like a leap. How does a product of prime powers relate to a simple sum involving and ?
The answer lies in the power of logarithms. Logarithms are the great translators of mathematics; they turn the complexity of multiplication into the simplicity of addition. When we apply the natural logarithm to our prime factorization, we get:
Using the product rule, , we can break this massive product into a sum:
And with the power rule, , those exponents that were hiding in the shadows jump to the front, giving us a clean, manageable expression:

The Inequality Bridge

Now, let us look at the individual components of this sum. We know that are distinct prime numbers. What is the smallest prime number? It is .
Therefore, for any prime , we must have . Because the natural logarithm function is strictly increasing, applying it to both sides of this inequality preserves the direction: .
Next, consider the exponents . Since is a natural number, its prime factors must have positive integer exponents. Thus, .
Now, we have two simple inequalities: and . Since all these values are positive, we can multiply them together without fear of flipping the inequality sign:

The Grand Conclusion

We have reached the final stage of our journey. We know that each term in our summation, , is at least . If we sum these terms from to , we are essentially adding to itself times:
On the left, we have our original . On the right, we have copies of , which is simply . Thus, we arrive at the elegant conclusion:
This result is more than just an inequality; it is a testament to the structure of numbers. The number of distinct prime factors acts as a fundamental lower bound for the logarithm of . It is a beautiful, simple, and powerful truth that lies at the heart of number theory.

Similar Questions