Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing before a massive, intimidating matrix expression. It looks like a tangled web of transposes, adjoints, and inverses. In the world of JEE Advanced, this is a classic psychological trap.
The problem asks for the determinant of E=∣ATA(adj(2A))−1(adj(4B))(adj(AB))−1AAT∣. Your first instinct might be to panic, but let us take a deep breath. We are not here to compute matrices; we are here to dismantle them using the elegant laws of linear algebra.
The Toolkit
Before we touch the expression, let us sharpen our tools. We have five fundamental properties that will act as our scalpel:
1. The product property: ∣XY∣=∣X∣⋅∣Y∣.
2. The transpose property: ∣AT∣=∣A∣.
3. The inverse property: ∣M−1∣=∣M∣1.
4. The adjoint property: ∣adj(M)∣=∣M∣n−1.
5. The scalar property: ∣kM∣=kn∣M∣.
Since our matrices are of order n=3, the adjoint property simplifies to ∣adj(M)∣=∣M∣2, and the scalar property becomes ∣kM∣=k3∣M∣. These are the keys to the kingdom.
The Simplification
Let us apply the product property to our expression. We can split the single large determinant into a product of several individual determinants:
E=∣AT∣⋅∣A∣⋅∣(adj(2A))−1∣⋅∣adj(4B)∣⋅∣(adj(AB))−1∣⋅∣A∣⋅∣AT∣
Using the transpose property, we know ∣AT∣=∣A∣. So, we have ∣A∣⋅∣A∣⋅∣A∣⋅∣A∣, which is ∣A∣4.
Now, let us handle the inverses and adjoints. Using the inverse property, ∣(adj(2A))−1∣=∣adj(2A)∣1 and ∣(adj(AB))−1∣=∣adj(AB)∣1. Substituting these, our expression becomes:
E=∣A∣4⋅∣adj(2A)∣1⋅∣adj(4B)∣⋅∣adj(AB)∣1
Now, apply the adjoint property (∣adj(M)∣=∣M∣2):
E=∣A∣4⋅∣2A∣21⋅∣4B∣2⋅∣AB∣21
The Grand Cancellation
We are almost there. Now we use the scalar property. For ∣2A∣, we pull out the scalar 2, which becomes 23=8. So, ∣2A∣=8∣A∣. Squaring this gives:
∣2A∣2=(8∣A∣)2=64∣A∣2=26∣A∣2
Similarly, for ∣4B∣, we pull out 4, which becomes 43=64=26. So, ∣4B∣=26∣B∣. Squaring this gives:
Finally, ∣AB∣2=(∣A∣⋅∣B∣)2=∣A∣2∣B∣2. Now, let us assemble the pieces:
E=∣A∣4⋅26∣A∣21⋅212∣B∣2⋅∣A∣2∣B∣21
Look at the numerator and denominator. The ∣A∣4 in the numerator cancels perfectly with the ∣A∣2⋅∣A∣2 in the denominator. The ∣B∣2 in the numerator cancels with the ∣B∣2 in the denominator.
We are left with:
The variables vanished, leaving behind a clean, elegant integer. This is the beauty of mathematics—the complexity dissolves when you apply the right principles.