Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing in front of a vast, abstract canvas representing our sample space, S. Within this space, two events, A and B, exist as distinct regions.
We are given their probabilities, P(A)=31 and P(B)=61, and we are told they are independent.
This word, 'independent,' is not just a label; it is a profound mathematical relationship. It tells us that the occurrence of B is completely irrelevant to the occurrence of A. Whether B happens or not, A remains indifferent.
The Logic of Complements
Now, consider the event B′, which is the complement of B, or 'not B.' If B is independent of A, then logically, the non-occurrence of B must also be independent of A.
This is a powerful tool in your JEE arsenal. If A and B are independent, then A and B′ are also independent.
This means that knowing B did not happen gives us zero information about A.
The Algebraic Proof
Let us test this using the formal definition of conditional probability. We want to evaluate P(A∣B′), which is defined as:
The numerator, P(A∩B′), represents the probability that A occurs AND B does not occur. Because A and B′ are independent, we can express this intersection as a simple product:
Now, substitute this back into our conditional probability formula:
Look at the beauty of this expression! The term P(B′) appears in both the numerator and the denominator.
As long as $P(B')
eq 0$, which is true here since P(B)=61, we can cancel them out. The expression simplifies elegantly to:
The Final Revelation
We have arrived at a result that confirms our intuition. The conditional probability of A given B′ is simply P(A).
Since we were given P(A)=31, we conclude that P(A∣B′)=31.
The math is not just a set of rules; it is a language that describes the underlying structure of uncertainty. When you see 'independent' in a JEE problem, do not just reach for the formula; visualize the independence, trust the property of complements, and watch as the complex terms cancel out to reveal the simple truth.