Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing on the edge of a mathematical landscape, looking at three mysterious blocks: log32, log3(2x−5), and log3(2x−27).
The problem states that these three terms are in an Arithmetic Progression (A.P.).
In the language of algebra, if a,b,c are in A.P., then they must satisfy the condition 2b=a+c. This relationship serves as our North Star for the calculation.
The Foundation
Applying the A.P. Condition
We start by setting up our equation using the middle term log3(2x−5).
Equating the double of the middle term to the sum of the first and third terms, we get:
2log3(2x−5)=log32+log3(2x−27)
This is the moment where the structure of the problem begins to reveal itself. We are balancing the logarithmic scale.
The Logarithmic Toolkit
We now simplify the expression using standard logarithmic properties.
Using the power rule, nloga=logan, we move the coefficient of 2 inside the logarithm on the left side. Using the product rule, loga+logb=log(ab), we merge the terms on the right side.
The equation simplifies to:
log3(2x−5)2=log3[2(2x−27)]
This results in the cleaner form:
log3(2x−5)2=log3(2⋅2x−7)
The Algebraic Transformation
Since we have log3 on both sides, we equate the arguments:
To simplify, we use the substitution t=2x. Our equation transforms into a quadratic:
Expanding the left side gives t2−10t+25=2t−7. Rearranging all terms to one side, we arrive at the quadratic equation:
The Final Verdict
The Domain Check
Factorizing the quadratic yields (t−4)(t−8)=0. This provides two potential values for t: t=4 and t=8.
Since t=2x, we find:
1. 2x=4⇒x=2
2. 2x=8⇒x=3
Before concluding, we must perform a domain check to ensure the arguments of the original logarithms remain positive.
If we test x=2, the argument 2x−5 becomes 22−5=−1. Since the logarithm of a negative number is undefined, x=2 is an extraneous solution.
Testing x=3 yields 23−5=3 and 23−3.5=4.5, both of which are positive.
The final valid solution is x=3.