Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing at the threshold of a logarithmic landscape. You have three terms: 1, log9(31−x+2), and log3(4⋅3x−1).
These terms are locked in an Arithmetic Progression (A.P.). In any A.P., the middle term is the bridge between the first and the last.
Mathematically, if a,b,c are in A.P., then 2b=a+c. Applying this to our terms, we obtain the following relationship:
2log9(31−x+2)=1+log3(4⋅3x−1)
The Logarithmic Jungle
We observe a base mismatch between 9 and 3. We utilize the change-of-base property, logakB=k1logaB.
Since 9=32, we rewrite the term as log9(31−x+2)=21log3(31−x+2).
When substituted back into our equation, the 2 and the 21 cancel each other out, simplifying the expression to:
log3(31−x+2)=1+log3(4⋅3x−1)
The Quadratic Transformation
To combine the terms, we express the constant 1 as log33. The equation now reads:
log3(31−x+2)=log33+log3(4⋅3x−1)
Using the product rule logA+logB=log(AB), the right side becomes log3[3⋅(4⋅3x−1)], which simplifies to log3(12⋅3x−3).
Equating the arguments of the logarithms, we get:
Let t=3x. The equation transforms into:
Multiplying by t yields the quadratic equation:
The Final Victory
Solving 12t2−5t−3=0 by splitting the middle term gives us the factors (4t−3)(3t+1)=0. This results in two potential values: t=43 or t=−31.
We must respect the domain constraints. Since t=3x, t must be strictly positive. Therefore, we reject t=−31.
Setting 3x=43 and taking the logarithm on both sides, we find:
This simplifies to x=log33−log34. Thus, the final solution is:
x=1−log34