Animated Solution for Mathematics - Matrices and Determinants: For any 3×3 matrix M, let ∣M∣ denote the determinant of M. Let E=12823133418, P=100001010 and F=18231842133. If Q is a nonsingular matrix of order 3×3, then which of the following statements is (are) TRUE ?
Select Answer:
* Multiple Correct
Visualized Solution
Analyze Matrix P
Given P=100001010
Notice that P is an identity matrix with its 2nd and 3rd rows swapped.
This makes P a permutation matrix.
Compute P2
Let's compute P2=P×P.
P2=100001010100001010=100010001=I
Therefore, P−1=P.
Compute PEP
Let's find PEP.
Pre-multiplying E by P swaps the 2nd and 3rd rows of E.
Post-multiplying PE by P swaps the 2nd and 3rd columns.
PEP=18231842133
Verify Option A
Compare PEP with given matrix F.
F=18231842133
Clearly, F=PEP.
We already proved P2=I.
Hence, Option A is True.
Determinant of E
Let's calculate ∣E∣.
∣E∣=12823133418
Expanding along the first row:
∣E∣=1(54−52)−2(36−32)+3(26−24)
Evaluate ∣E∣ and ∣F∣
∣E∣=1(2)−2(4)+3(2)
∣E∣=2−8+6=0
Since F=PEP, ∣F∣=∣P∣⋅∣E∣⋅∣P∣
∣F∣=∣P∣⋅0⋅∣P∣=0
Analyze Option B (LHS)
Evaluate LHS: ∣EQ+PFQ−1∣
Substitute F=PEP: PF=P(PEP)=P2EP
Since P2=I, PF=EP
LHS =∣EQ+EPQ−1∣=∣E(Q+PQ−1)∣
LHS =∣E∣⋅∣Q+PQ−1∣=0
Analyze Option B (RHS)
Evaluate RHS: ∣EQ∣+∣PFQ−1∣
∣EQ∣=∣E∣⋅∣Q∣=0⋅∣Q∣=0
∣PFQ−1∣=∣P∣⋅∣F∣⋅∣Q−1∣=∣P∣⋅0⋅∣Q−1∣=0
RHS =0+0=0
LHS = RHS, so Option B is True.
Verify Option C
Evaluate ∣(EF)3∣>∣EF∣2
∣EF∣=∣E∣⋅∣F∣=0⋅0=0
LHS =03=0
RHS =02=0
0>0 is a false statement.
Hence, Option C is False.
Trace of a Matrix
For Option D, we need the sum of diagonal entries, which is the Trace of a matrix, denoted as Tr(M).
(D) Sum of diagonal entries of P−1EP+F is equal to sum of diagonal entries of E+P−1FP
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Algebraic Operations on Matrices
Analyzing the Setup
We begin by examining the matrix P=100001010. This is a permutation matrix, which acts as an operator that swaps the second and third rows of any matrix it pre-multiplies.
When we pre-multiply a matrix E by P, the rows of E are swapped. Conversely, post-multiplying by P performs the same operation on the columns. This relationship is central to understanding the transformation F=PEP.
The Determinant Trap
Next, we calculate the determinant of matrix E. Expanding along the first row, we have:
∣E∣=1(54−52)−2(36−32)+3(26−24)
Performing the arithmetic:
∣E∣=1(2)−2(4)+3(2)=2−8+6=0
Since ∣E∣=0, the matrix E is singular. Because F=PEP, the determinant of F is given by ∣F∣=∣P∣⋅∣E∣⋅∣P∣. Since ∣P∣=−1, we find ∣F∣=(−1)⋅0⋅(−1)=0.
Unraveling the Options
With ∣E∣=0 and ∣F∣=0, we evaluate the given options. For Option B, we consider the expression ∣EQ+PFQ−1∣.
Given F=PEP, we substitute to find PF=P(PEP)=P2EP. Since P2=I, this simplifies to PF=EP.
The expression becomes ∣EQ+EPQ−1∣, which factors to ∣E(Q+PQ−1)∣. Because ∣E∣=0, the entire determinant is 0. The right-hand side ∣EQ∣+∣PFQ−1∣ also evaluates to 0+0=0, confirming that Option B is correct.
Evaluating Further Claims
Option C claims that ∣(EF)3∣>∣EF∣2. Since ∣EF∣=∣E∣⋅∣F∣=0⋅0=0, the inequality reduces to 0>0, which is false.
Finally, we examine the trace in Option D. Using the cyclic property of the trace, Tr(ABC)=Tr(BCA), we observe:
Tr(P−1EP)=Tr(EPP−1)=Tr(E)
Comparing Tr(P−1EP+F) and Tr(E+P−1FP), both sides simplify to Tr(E)+Tr(F). This confirms the symmetry of the trace property.
In linear algebra, recognizing these structural patterns is far more powerful than brute-force calculation.