Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, future engineers. Today, we aren't just solving a matrix problem; we are detectives investigating the 'DNA' of matrices. We are looking for the square roots of matrices—a concept that feels abstract but is rooted in the solid ground of linear algebra.
We are given four matrices, and our mission is to identify which of them cannot be expressed as the square of a 3×3 real matrix. Let's dive in.
The Determinant Gatekeeper
Imagine we have a matrix M that is the square of some real matrix A. Mathematically, we write this as M=A2.
Now, how do we test if such an A exists? We need a filter, a 'gatekeeper' property that separates the possible from the impossible. The most powerful tool in our arsenal is the determinant.
If we take the determinant of both sides, we get ∣M∣=∣A2∣. Using the fundamental property of determinants, ∣An∣=∣A∣n, we arrive at the elegant relation:
This is the key to the kingdom. Since A is a real matrix, its determinant ∣A∣ must be a real number.
And what is the most sacred rule of real numbers? The square of any real number is always non-negative. Therefore, for M to be a square, it is absolutely mandatory that ∣M∣≥0.
If ∣M∣<0, the matrix M simply cannot be a square of a real matrix. This is our golden rule.
The Filter in Action
Let's apply this rule to our candidates. Consider Option A:
Since this is a diagonal matrix, its determinant is simply the product of its diagonal elements: (1)(1)(−1)=−1. Because −1<0, Option A fails our test immediately. It cannot be a square.
Now, look at Option B:
Again, the determinant is (−1)(−1)(−1)=−1. This also fails the test. We have successfully identified two matrices that are not squares.
The Subtle Trap
Now, we must be careful. We have Options C and D left. Option C is the identity matrix I. We know that I2=I, so it is clearly a square.
But what about Option D?
Its determinant is (1)(−1)(−1)=1. Since 1≥0, it passes our determinant test. But does that guarantee it is a square? Not necessarily.
The determinant condition is necessary, but not always sufficient. We must look deeper. Notice the structure: the top-left is 1, and the bottom-right is a 2×2 block of −1s.
This looks like a rotation. Specifically, it represents a 180∘ rotation in the y−z plane. Can we achieve this in two steps? Yes! A 180∘ rotation is just two successive 90∘ rotations.
If we define A as:
Then A2 will indeed yield MD. Thus, Option D is a valid square.
Conclusion
By using the determinant as our filter and geometric intuition to verify the remaining candidates, we have solved the mystery.
Options A and B are the ones that cannot be the square of a real matrix.
Keep this logic in your toolkit: when in doubt, check the determinant, but always keep an eye out for the geometric transformations hidden within the numbers.