The Breath of the River
Imagine a serene, crystal-clear river. Beneath its surface, a delicate balance of life thrives. Fish, plants, and microscopic organisms all depend on one invisible, life-sustaining element: Dissolved Oxygen (DO).
But what happens when organic waste—like sewage or agricultural runoff—enters this pristine ecosystem? This is where our crucial parameter, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), comes into play.
BOD is essentially a measure of how much oxygen the aerobic bacteria will consume as they feast on the organic waste. If there is a massive feast (high waste), the bacteria multiply rapidly and consume a massive amount of oxygen.
This leaves the fish gasping for air. Therefore, a high BOD directly translates to dangerously low Dissolved Oxygen.
Decoding the Statements
Let's look at Statement I: "The value of the parameter BOD is important for survival of aquatic life."
Given our understanding, this statement is an absolute truth. Monitoring BOD is like checking the pulse of a water body. If the BOD is too high, the aquatic ecosystem is suffocating. It is a critical indicator of water health.
Now, let's analyze Statement II: "The optimum value of BOD is 6.5 ppm."
To judge this, we need to know the standard benchmarks. For truly clean and healthy water, the BOD should be extremely low, typically less than 5 ppm.
On the extreme end, highly polluted water—the kind that resembles an open sewer—has a BOD of 17 ppm or more.
The Verdict
So, where does 6.5 ppm fit in? It sits above the clean water threshold. A BOD of 6.5 ppm indicates that the water is moderately polluted.
The "optimum" value for the survival of aquatic life should be as close to zero as possible, definitely below 5 ppm. Therefore, claiming that 6.5 ppm is the optimum value is factually incorrect.
Statement I is True, and Statement II is False. This leads us directly to our final answer.