The Setup
A Tale of Two Wires
Imagine a composite wire stretched tightly between two rigid walls. This wire is made of two distinct sections, A and B, joined perfectly in the middle. Both sections share the exact same length L and are forged from the identical material. However, they differ in thickness: wire A has a radius r, while wire B is twice as thick with a radius 2r.
When this composite string is plucked or driven by an external oscillator, it vibrates. The problem presents a fascinating constraint: the joint between the two wires acts as a node. This means the joint remains perfectly stationary, effectively decoupling the standing wave patterns in wire A and wire B, even though they are vibrating at the exact same frequency f.
Mass Density and Wave Speed
To understand how the waves behave in each section, we first need to determine their linear mass densities (μ). The linear mass density is the mass per unit length, which can be expressed as the volume density (ρ) multiplied by the cross-sectional area (A=πr2).
For wire
B, the radius is doubled (
2r), which quadruples the cross-sectional area:
μB=ρπ(2r)2=4ρπr2=4μ
Now, let's look at the wave speed. The speed of a transverse wave on a stretched string is governed by the tension
T and the linear mass density
μ:
Since the wires are connected in series, the tension
T must be uniform throughout the entire length to maintain equilibrium. Let's compare the wave speeds:
The wave travels exactly half as fast in the thicker wire B!
Standing Waves and Frequencies
Because the joint is a node, both wire
A and wire
B act like independent strings fixed at both ends. The frequency of the
n-th harmonic for a string of length
L is given by:
f=2Lnv
We are told that wire A forms p antinodes (loops) and wire B forms q antinodes. Since they are driven as a single coupled system, their frequencies must be identical (fA=fB).
Let's write out the frequency equations for both sections:
fA=2LpvA
fB=2LqvB
The Final Ratio
Equating the two frequencies gives us the master equation for this problem:
2LpvA=2LqvB
The
2L terms gracefully cancel out, leaving a direct relationship between the number of loops and the wave speeds:
pvA=qvB
Now, we substitute our earlier finding that
vB=2vA:
pvA=q(2vA)
The
vA terms cancel out, yielding:
p=2q⟹qp=21
The ratio of the number of antinodes in wire A to wire B is 1:2. This makes perfect physical sense: the thicker wire has a slower wave speed, which results in a shorter wavelength for the same frequency. A shorter wavelength naturally accommodates more loops within the same length L.