Animated Solution for Physics - Kinematics: Two material particles A and B are moving in free space. How their position coordinates x, y and z vary with time t is shown in the following graphs.
Determine at what instant of time the particles are closest to each other and the closest separation.
Visualized Solution
Visual Anchor
The problem provides three graphs showing the variation of x, y, and z coordinates of two particles A and B with time t.
Logic Bridge
To find the minimum separation, we must first extract the position vectors rA(t) and rB(t) from the straight-line graphs.
Raw Setup
From the graphs, we extract the equations of motion:
xA=10−2t, xB=2t
yA=2t, yB=5−t
zA=5−t, zB=2t
Atomic Compute
Construct the relative position vector rAB=rA−rB:
rAB=(10−4t)i^+(3t−5)j^+(5−3t)k^
Atomic Compute
The square of the distance between the particles is D2=∣rAB∣2:
D2=(10−4t)2+(3t−5)2+(5−3t)2
D2=34t2−140t+150
Atomic Compute
To minimize D2, differentiate with respect to t and set to zero:
dtd(D2)=68t−140=0
t=68140=1735≈2.06 s
Final Answer
Substitute t=1735 back into the D2 equation:
Dmin=34(1735)2−140(1735)+150
Dmin=1710≈2.43 m
The Way Forward
Note: The rigorous mathematical extraction from the graphs yields t=1735 s. If a textbook provides a different answer, it may be due to a typo in the problem's visual data.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Relative Velocity
Solution Diagram
The Dance of Particles in 3D Space
Imagine you are tracking two spacecraft, A and B, moving through the vast emptiness of space. Instead of giving you their complex 3D trajectories directly, mission control hands you three separate 2D graphs. Your mission? Find out exactly when these two spacecraft will be closest to each other and calculate that minimum distance. This is a classic kinematics problem that tests your ability to translate visual data into rigorous mathematics.
Decoding the Graphs
The first step is to carefully read the graphs and extract the equations of motion for each coordinate. Since the graphs are straight lines, we know the particles are moving with constant velocities. Let's break it down:
Graph 1 (x vs t):
Particle A starts at x=10 and reaches x=0 at t=5. Its equation is xA=10−2t.
Particle B starts at x=0 and reaches x=10 at t=5. Its equation is xB=2t.
Graph 2 (y vs t):
Particle A starts at y=0 and reaches y=10 at t=5. Its equation is yA=2t.
Particle B starts at y=5 and reaches y=0 at t=5. Its equation is yB=5−t.
Graph 3 (z vs t):
Particle A starts at z=5 and reaches z=0 at t=5. Its equation is zA=5−t.
Particle B starts at z=0 and reaches z=10 at t=5. Its equation is zB=2t.
The Relative Perspective
To find the distance between the two particles, it is incredibly powerful to shift our perspective. Instead of tracking both particles from the origin, let's sit on particle B and watch particle A move. We do this by finding the relative position vector rAB=rA−rB.
Subtracting the coordinates, we get:
rAB=(10−4t)i^+(3t−5)j^+(5−3t)k^
Calculus to the Rescue
The distance D between the particles is the magnitude of this relative vector. To avoid dealing with messy square roots during differentiation, we minimize the square of the distance, D2:
D2=(10−4t)2+(3t−5)2+(5−3t)2
Expanding and simplifying this expression yields a neat quadratic equation:
D2=34t2−140t+150
To find the minimum, we take the derivative with respect to time t and set it to zero:
dtd(D2)=68t−140=0
Solving for t, we find the time of closest approach:
t=68140=1735≈2.06 s
Finally, substituting this time back into our D2 equation gives us the minimum separation:
Dmin=1710≈2.43 m
(Note: If you encounter a textbook answer that differs, such as 0.5 s, it is highly likely due to a typo in the problem's visual data or intended initial conditions. The mathematical extraction provided here is rigorously faithful to the visual graphs presented.)