Animated Solution for Mathematics - Three Dimensional Geometry: The two lines x=ay+b,z=cy+d and x=a′y+b′,z=c′y+d′ will be perpendicular, if and only if
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Visualizing the Lines in 3D
Given lines: L1:x=ay+b,z=cy+d
Given lines: L2:x=a′y+b′,z=c′y+d′
Goal: Find the condition for perpendicularity (90∘ angle).
The Strategy: Symmetric Form
The given equations are in asymmetric form.
To find the angle between lines, we need their Direction Ratios.
Strategy: Convert to symmetric form ax−x1=by−y1=cz−z1.
Converting L1 to Symmetric Form (Part 1)
Consider the first part of L1: x=ay+b
Isolate y: x−b=ay
Divide by a: ax−b=y
Converting L1 to Symmetric Form (Part 2)
Consider the second part of L1: z=cy+d
Isolate y: z−d=cy
Divide by c: cz−d=y
Direction Ratios of L1
Equate the expressions for y: ax−b=1y=cz−d
The denominators give the Direction Ratios.
Direction Ratios of L1: (a,1,c)
Converting L2 to Symmetric Form
Similarly, for L2: x=a′y+b′ and z=c′y+d′
Isolate y in both: a′x−b′=y and c′z−d′=y
Symmetric form: a′x−b′=1y=c′z−d′
Direction Ratios of L2
From the symmetric form of L2: a′x−b′=1y=c′z−d′
The denominators give the Direction Ratios.
Direction Ratios of L2: (a′,1,c′)
Condition for Perpendicularity
Two lines with DRs (a1,b1,c1) and (a2,b2,c2) are perpendicular if:
a1a2+b1b2+c1c2=0
This comes from the dot product of their direction vectors being zero.
Applying the Condition
Substitute DRs of L1: (a,1,c)
Substitute DRs of L2: (a′,1,c′)
Equation: (a)(a′)+(1)(1)+(c)(c′)=0
Final Result
Simplifying the equation: aa′+1+cc′=0
Rearranging: aa′+cc′+1=0
This matches the first option.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Angle Between Two Lines
Solution Diagram
The Beauty of the Third Dimension
Welcome, future engineers. Today, we are stepping into the realm of 3D geometry.
When you first see equations like x=ay+b and z=cy+d, your instinct might be to panic. They do not look like the standard line equations you memorized in school.
However, mathematics is not about memorizing forms; it is about understanding the soul of the geometry. These equations are not obstacles; they are simply a different language describing the same beautiful, straight path in space.
The Asymmetric Trap
Let’s pause and visualize. In 3D space, a single equation like x=ay+b does not describe a line; it describes a plane because it lacks a constraint on the z-variable.
When we provide two such equations, x=ay+b and z=cy+d, we are defining the intersection of two planes. When two planes intersect, they create a line.
This is the 'asymmetric form' of a line. To find the angle between two lines, we need their direction ratios. We must translate this asymmetric language into the universal symmetric form:
lx−x1=my−y1=nz−z1
The Transformation
Imagine you are holding a tangled knot of string. To understand its orientation, you must straighten it out. That is exactly what we are doing algebraically.
Given x=ay+b, we isolate y to get ax−b=y. Similarly, for the second equation z=cy+d, we obtain cz−d=y.
Since both expressions are equal to y, they must be equal to each other. We can write this as a unified chain:
ax−b=1y=cz−d
The denominators a,1, and c are the direction ratios of our line L1. We have successfully extracted the DNA of the line from its asymmetric shell. We repeat this process for line L2, yielding direction ratios of a′,1, and c′.
The Perpendicularity Condition
We now have two lines with direction vectors v1=(a,1,c) and v2=(a′,1,c′). We want them to be perpendicular.
In the language of vectors, perpendicularity is synonymous with the dot product being zero. Because the dot product is defined as v1⋅v2=∣v1∣∣v2∣cos(θ), setting θ=90∘ forces the dot product to vanish.
We calculate the dot product:
(a)(a′)+(1)(1)+(c)(c′)=0
This simplifies elegantly to the final condition:
aa′+cc′+1=0
Conclusion
Look at what we have achieved. We started with two intimidating, asymmetric equations, and through the power of algebraic manipulation and geometric insight, we derived a simple, elegant condition for perpendicularity.
This is the essence of JEE Advanced mathematics. It is not about brute force; it is about seeing the structure beneath the surface. You have the tools and the logic to conquer these 3D problems with confidence.