Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing in a three-dimensional space, looking at three planes defined by the equations:
λx+2y+2z=5
2λx+3y+5z=8
4x+λy+6z=10
These planes are like sheets of glass floating in space, and their intersection is what we call the solution to our system. The parameter λ shifts these planes, and our mission is to find the specific values of λ that cause these planes to either never meet or to overlap in a way that creates a line or plane of intersection.
The Determinant as the Gatekeeper
To unlock this mystery, we turn to the most powerful tool in our linear algebra arsenal: the determinant of the coefficient matrix, D. Think of D as the 'volume' or 'scaling factor' of the transformation defined by our system.
If $D
eq 0$, the system is well-behaved and has a unique solution. When D=0, the system collapses, and we enter the realm of inconsistency or dependency. Let us calculate D:
Expanding this along the first row, we get:
D=λ(3×6−5×λ)−2(2λ×6−5×4)+2(2λ×λ−3×4)
Simplifying this expression, we find:
D=λ(18−5λ)−2(12λ−20)+2(2λ2−12)
D=−λ2−6λ+16
Finding the Critical Points
Now, we set D=0 to find the values of λ where the system's behavior changes. The equation −λ2−6λ+16=0 is equivalent to:
Factoring this quadratic, we look for two numbers that multiply to −16 and add to 6. Those numbers are 8 and −2. Thus:
This gives us the critical values λ=2 and λ=−8.
The Investigation of λ=2
Let us test the case where λ=2. We know D=0, but we must determine if the system is inconsistent or dependent. We calculate D1 by replacing the first column of the coefficient matrix with the constants 5,8,10:
Expanding this, we get:
D1=5(18−10)−2(48−50)+2(16−30)
D1=5(8)−2(−2)+2(−14)
D1=40+4−28=16
Since $D_1 = 16
eq 0$, the system is inconsistent. This means that when λ=2, the planes do not share a common point of intersection.
The algebraic conclusion is clear: there is no solution for this value. By systematically checking the determinant, you have proven that for λ=2, the system is inconsistent.