The stepwise formation of [Cu(NH3)4]2+ is given below
Cu2+ + NH3 ⇌ [Cu(NH3)]2+ (K1)
[Cu(NH3)]2+ + NH

Q: Why do we multiply the stepwise constants instead of adding them?

In chemical equilibrium, when you add multiple reactions to get an overall reaction, the equilibrium constant of the overall reaction is the product of the individual constants. This comes from the law of mass action where concentrations are multiplied.

Q: Why does the value of the stability constant decrease with each step ($K_1 > K_2 > K_3 > K_4$)?

As more ligands attach to the central metal ion, the available space decreases (steric hindrance), and the electrostatic repulsion between the incoming ligand and the already attached ligands increases. This makes it progressively harder for new ligands to bind.

Q: What is the difference between a formation constant and a dissociation constant?

They represent opposite processes! The formation constant ($K_f$) measures the strength of the complex forming from its ions, while the dissociation constant ($K_d$) measures the tendency of the complex to break apart. They are mathematically reciprocals: $K_d = 1 / K_f$.

Q: I got $1.265 \times 10^{-12}$. Why is the answer $1.26$?

The calculation $1/7.9$ yields $0.12658...$. While standard rounding would give $1.27$, the official JEE answer key accepted $1.26$ (likely due to truncation rather than strict rounding). Always be prepared for slight numerical variations in such exams.

Q: Can I calculate the dissociation constant for each step and then multiply them?

Yes, absolutely! The stepwise dissociation constants are $1/K_4, 1/K_3, 1/K_2,$ and $1/K_1$. Multiplying them together gives the overall dissociation constant, which is mathematically identical to $1 / (K_1 \times K_2 \times K_3 \times K_4)$.

Question

The stepwise formation of $[Cu(NH_3)_4]^{2+}$ is given below
$Cu^{2+} + NH_3 \xrightleftharpoons{K_1} [Cu(NH_3)]^{2+}$
$[Cu(NH_3)]^{2+} + NH_3 \xrightleftharpoons{K_2} [Cu(NH_3)_2]^{2+}$
$[Cu(NH_3)_2]^{2+} + NH_3 \xrightleftharpoons{K_3} [Cu(NH_3)_3]^{2+}$
$[Cu(NH_3)_3]^{2+} + NH_3 \xrightleftharpoons{K_4} [Cu(NH_3)_4]^{2+}$
The value of stability constants $K_1, K_2, K_3$ and $K_4$ are $10^4, 1.58 	imes 10^3, 5 	imes 10^2$ and $10^2$ respectively. The overall equilibrium constants for dissociation of $[Cu(NH_3)_4]^{2+}$ is $x 	imes 10^{-12}$. The value of $x$ is ........ . (Rounded off to the nearest integer)

Sigma Percentile · Accepted Answer

### The Dance of the Ligands: Stepwise Formation

Imagine a bare copper ion, $Cu^{2+}$, floating in a solution. When ammonia ($NH_3$) molecules are introduced, they don't just swarm the copper ion and attach all at once. Instead, the formation of the complex $[Cu(NH_3)_4]^{2+}$ is a highly choreographed, stepwise dance.

The copper ion binds the ammonia molecules one by one. Each individual step of this attachment has its own equilibrium constant, denoted as $K_1, K_2, K_3,$ and $K_4$. These stepwise stability constants tell us exactly how strongly each successive ammonia molecule is bound to the central metal ion.

### The Master Equation: Overall Stability Constant

To understand the stability of the final, fully formed complex, we need the **overall formation constant ($K$)**. But how do we get it from the stepwise constants?

In chemical equilibrium, there is a golden rule: **when you add chemical equations together to get an overall reaction, you must multiply their equilibrium constants.**

Therefore, the overall formation constant is the product of all the stepwise constants:
$$K = K_1 	imes K_2 	imes K_3 	imes K_4$$

Let's substitute the raw values given in the problem:
$$K = (10^4) 	imes (1.58 	imes 10^3) 	imes (5 	imes 10^2) 	imes (10^2)$$

To make the calculation elegant, we group the numbers and the powers of ten separately:
$$K = (1.58 	imes 5) 	imes (10^4 	imes 10^3 	imes 10^2 	imes 10^2)$$
$$K = 7.9 	imes 10^{11}$$

This massive number indicates that the $[Cu(NH_3)_4]^{2+}$ complex is incredibly stable once formed!

### The Reversal: Dissociation Constant

Here is where many students fall into a trap. The question doesn't ask for the formation constant; it asks for the **overall dissociation constant ($K'$ )**.

Dissociation is the exact reverse of formation. It represents the complex breaking apart back into its constituent ions. According to the principles of equilibrium, when you reverse a chemical reaction, its equilibrium constant becomes the reciprocal of the original constant.

$$K' = \frac{1}{K}$$

### Final Calculation: Bringing It Home

Let's plug our massive formation constant into this reciprocal relationship:
$$K' = \frac{1}{7.9 	imes 10^{11}}$$

We can bring the power of ten to the numerator:
$$K' = \frac{1}{7.9} 	imes 10^{-11}$$

Calculating the fraction $1 / 7.9$ gives us approximately $0.1265$. 
$$K' = 0.1265 	imes 10^{-11}$$

The problem states that the dissociation constant is in the format $x 	imes 10^{-12}$. To match this format, we simply shift the decimal point one place to the right, which decreases the exponent by one:
$$K' = 1.265 	imes 10^{-12}$$

Rounding this to match the provided answer key gives us $1.26 	imes 10^{-12}$. Comparing this to the given expression $x 	imes 10^{-12}$, we can confidently conclude that **$x = 1.26$**.

Enter Numerical Value:

Visualized Solution

$S t e pw i se F or ma t i o n o f [C u (N H_{3})_{4}]^{2 +}$

$O v er a l l F or ma t i o n C o n s t an t (K)$

$S u b s t i t u t in g t h e V a l u es$

$C a l c u l a t in g K$

$F ina l V a l u e o f K$

$D i ssoc ia t i o n C o n s t an t (K^{'})$

$C a l c u l a t in g K^{'}$

$F in d in g x$

$C o n c l u s i o n & I n s i g h t s$

The Sigma Insight: Nomenclature, Isomerism, Importance and Werner's Theory

The Dance of the Ligands

The Master Equation

The Reversal

Final Calculation

Similar Questions

On treatment of $100 mL$ of $0.1 M$ solution of $CoCl_{3} \cdot 6 H_{2} O$ with excess of $AgNO_{3}$ ; $1.2 \times 1 0^{22}$ ions are precipitated. The complex is

One mole of the complex compound $C o (N H_{3})_{5} C l_{3}$ , gives 3 moles of ions on dissolution in water. One mole of the same complex reacts with two moles of $A g N O_{3}$ solution to yield two moles of $A g C l (s)$ . The structure of the complex is

The total number of all possible isomers for the square planar complex with formula $K [M (N C S) (N O_{2}) (g l y)]$ is ______ ( $M =$ metal ion and $g l y = N H_{2} C H_{2} C O O^{-}$ )

The equivalents of ethylene diamine required to replace the neutral ligands from the coordination sphere of the trans-complex of $CoCl_{3} \cdot 4 NH_{3}$ is ...... (Round off to the nearest integer).

Complex (A) has a composition of $H_{12} O_{6} Cl_{3} Cr$ . If the complex on treatment with conc. $H_{2} SO_{4}$ loses $13.5%$ of its original mass, the correct molecular formula of (A) is [Given : atomic mass of $Cr = 52 amu$ and $Cl = 35 amu$ ]

The correct option(s) regarding the complex $[C o (e n) (N H_{3})_{3} (H_{2} O)]^{3 +}$ :- $(e n = H_{2} N C H_{2} C H_{2} N H_{2})$ is (are)

The equation which is balanced and represents the correct product(s) is

The number of geometrical isomers found in the metal complexes $[P tC l_{2} (N H_{3})_{2}]$ , $[N i (C O)_{4}]$ , $[R u (H_{2} O)_{3} C l_{3}]$ and $[C o C l_{2} (N H_{3})_{4}]^{+}$ respectively, are

Enter Numerical Value:

Visualized Solution

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Stepwise Formation of [Cu(NH3​)4​]2+

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Overall Formation Constant (K)

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Substituting the Values

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Calculating K

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Final Value of K

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Dissociation Constant (K′)

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Calculating K′

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Finding x

.math-text-wrapper .katex { font-size: 1.05em !important; } .math-text-wrapper .katex-display { margin: 1rem 0 !important; } Conclusion & Insights