Sigma Percentile
JEE Main 2023 (29 January Shift 2)
LEVELBoard

Animated Solution for Mathematics - Sets and Relations: The statement is equivalent to

Select Answer:

Visualized Solution

The Original Statement

  • Given statement:
  • We need to find an equivalent statement from the options.
  • Two statements are equivalent if they have the same truth values for all cases.

Applying the Implication Law

  • Recall the Implication Law:
  • Let and
  • Substituting these, we get:

The Associative Law

  • All operators are now logical OR ().
  • We can use the Associative Law to regroup the terms.
  • Rearranging gives:

Identifying the Tautology

  • Recall the Complement Law: A statement OR its negation is always True ().
  • Therefore,
  • Our expression becomes:

Final Simplification to

  • Identity Law for OR:
  • Since one operand is True, the entire OR statement is True.
  • Conclusion: The original statement is a Tautology.

Evaluating Option 1

  • Let's check Option 1:
  • We need to see if this is also a Tautology, or an exact match.

Simplifying Option 1

  • Apply Implication Law to the inner bracket:
  • Substitute back:
  • This is exactly our original statement!

Option 1 is the Exact Match

  • Since Option 1 simplifies to the exact original statement, it is logically equivalent.
  • It is also a Tautology ().

Checking Option 2

  • Let's quickly check Option 2:
  • Test with and .

Disproving Option 2

  • If and , then is .
  • The statement becomes , which is .
  • Since it can be False, it is not a Tautology.

The Sigma Insight: Types of Sets and Set Operations

Solution Diagram

Analyzing the Setup

Welcome, future engineers! Today, we are diving into the fascinating world of symbolic logic. It is the foundation upon which all of computer science and mathematics is built.
The problem before us is a classic: we are given the statement and asked to find its equivalent. At first glance, it might look like a jumble of symbols, but let's peel back the layers and reveal the beautiful, logical structure underneath.

Deconstructing the Implication

The most important tool in our arsenal is the Implication Law. It tells us that any implication is logically equivalent to .
Think of this as a translation key. It allows us to move from the conditional 'if-then' world into the 'or' world, which is much easier to manipulate.
In our problem, let and . Applying the law, our original statement transforms into:
Suddenly, the scary implication arrow is gone, replaced by the familiar OR operator.

The Power of Associativity and Complement

Now, look at our expression: . Notice that every single operator is an OR ().
This is a massive advantage! Because the OR operator is associative, we can move the parentheses wherever we want without changing the truth value of the expression. Let's regroup the terms to bring the s together:
Why did we do this? Because of the Complement Law! The Complement Law states that any statement OR-ed with its own negation is always True.
So, is a Tautology, which we represent as . Our expression now simplifies to .

The Final Simplification

We are almost there. We have . In the world of logic, the OR operator is like a 'safety net.'
If even one side of an OR statement is True, the entire statement is True, regardless of what the other side is. Since is always True, the entire expression is simply True.
Our original statement is a Tautology! It is true under every possible combination of truth values for and .

Matching the Options

Now, we just need to find which option matches this structure. We checked Option 1: .
Expanding the inner implication, we get . This is an exact match to our original statement! Since they are identical, they must be equivalent.
We also tested Option 2, , and found that it can be False (for example, if is True and is False). Therefore, Option 1 is our clear winner.
Remember, logic is not just about memorizing rules; it is about seeing the patterns. Keep practicing, stay curious, and you will master this!

Similar Questions

JEE Main 2023 (10 April Shift 2)
LEVELBoard

The statement is equivalent to

(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
JEE Main 2023 (13 April Shift 2)
LEVELBoard

The statement is equivalent to

(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
JEE Main 2023 (24 January Shift 1)
LEVELJEE Main

The compound statement is equivalent to

(A)
((\sim P) \vee Q) \wedge((\sim Q) \vee P)
(B)
(\sim Q) \vee P
(C)
((\sim P) \vee Q) \wedge(\sim Q)
(D)
(\sim P) \vee Q
JEE Main 2023 (24 January Shift 2)
LEVELJEE Main

Let and be two statements. Then is equivalent to

(A)
p \vee(p \wedge(\sim q))
(B)
p \vee((\sim p) \wedge q)
(C)
(\sim p) \vee q
(D)
p \vee(p \wedge q)
JEE Main 2021 (February)
LEVELBoard

The statement is equivalent to:

JEE Main 2008
LEVELBoard

The statement is equivalent to

(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
JEE Main 2022 (27 June Shift 1)
LEVELJEE Main

The Boolean expression is equivalent to :

(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
JEE Main 2022 (29 July Shift 2)
LEVELBoard

The statement is NOT equivalent to:

(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
JEE Main 2022 (25 June Shift 2)
LEVELBoard

The negation of the Boolean expression is logically equivalent to

(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
JEE Main 2021 (27 July Shift 1)
LEVELBoard

The compound statement is equivalent to:

(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)