Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, fellow traveler of the mathematical landscape! Today, we are embarking on a journey to solve a classic problem in combinatorics.
We are tasked with partitioning a set S={1,2,3,…,12} into three distinct sets A,B, and C, each containing exactly four elements. This is a gateway to understanding the profound difference between labeled and unlabeled groups, a concept that often trips up even the most seasoned JEE aspirants.
Imagine you are standing before three empty, distinct containers, each labeled with a unique name: A,B, and C. You have twelve distinct items, and your goal is to distribute them such that each container holds exactly four items.
Because the containers are labeled, placing a specific set of four numbers into container A is fundamentally different from placing that same set into container B. This distinction is the core of our problem.
The Sequential Selection
Let us break this down into a sequence of deliberate choices. First, we approach container A. We have all twelve elements at our disposal and need to select four of them.
The number of ways to do this is given by the combination formula:
Now, with four elements safely tucked away in container A, we turn our attention to container B. We are left with 12−4=8 elements. From these eight, we must choose four for container B:
Finally, we look at container C. We have only four elements remaining, and we must place all of them into this last container. The number of ways to do this is:
The Power of the Product Rule
Since these choices are sequential and independent, we apply the fundamental product rule of counting. The total number of ways to partition the set is the product of our individual choices:
Total Ways=(412)×(48)×(44)
Substituting our factorial expressions, we get:
Total Ways=4!⋅8!12!×4!⋅4!8!×4!⋅0!4!
Observe the elegance of the cancellation! The 8! in the denominator of the first term cancels with the 8! in the numerator of the second. We are left with a beautifully simplified expression:
Total Ways=4!⋅4!⋅4!12!=(4!)312!
The Labeled vs
Unlabeled Trap
Here is the moment of truth. Many students, driven by habit, might be tempted to divide this result by 3!.
That division is only necessary if the sets A,B, and C were indistinguishable—if they were just three identical, unlabeled piles. Because our sets are distinct, labeled entities, the order in which we fill them matters.
If we were to swap the contents of A and B, we would have a different partition. Therefore, we do not divide by 3!.
You have successfully navigated the trap! The final answer is:
Keep this logic close to your heart, and you will find that even the most complex combinatorial problems begin to yield to your understanding.