The Art of Observation
Look closely at the structure of the equation:
(x2−9x+11)2−(x−4)(x−5)=3
If we expand the product (x−4)(x−5), we obtain x2−5x−4x+20, which simplifies to x2−9x+20.
The term x2−9x is the heartbeat of this equation. By recognizing this common structure, we avoid the trap of expanding a quartic polynomial and instead prepare to solve a simpler quadratic in disguise.
The Power of Substitution
Whenever you see a repeating algebraic block, substitution is your best friend. Let us define a new variable,
t, such that:
t=x2−9x+11
Since
x2−9x+20 can be written as
(x2−9x+11)+9, it follows that this term is equal to
t+9. Our equation now transforms into a manageable quadratic:
t2−(t+9)=3
Simplifying this expression, we get:
t2−t−12=0
This is a classic factorization problem. We seek two numbers that multiply to
−12 and add to
−1, which are
−4 and
3. Thus, the equation factors as:
(t−4)(t+3)=0
This yields two potential cases: t=4 and t=−3.
The Discriminant's Verdict
Now, we must return to our original variable x for each case.
For
t=4, we have:
x2−9x+11=4⇒x2−9x+7=0
We calculate the discriminant
D=b2−4ac:
D=(−9)2−4(1)(7)=81−28=53
Since 53 is not a perfect square, the roots for this case are irrational. We discard them as the problem specifically concerns rational roots.
For
t=−3, we have:
x2−9x+11=−3⇒x2−9x+14=0
This quadratic factors perfectly:
(x−2)(x−7)=0
The roots are x=2 and x=7. Both are rational.
The Final Victory
The question asks for the product of all rational roots. We have identified them as 2 and 7.
By choosing the path of substitution over the path of expansion, we turned a potential nightmare into a moment of clarity. The final answer is 14.