Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing before a 2×2 matrix, a simple grid of four numbers. You are tasked with filling these slots using only the numbers from the set S={2,3,6,9}.
The matrix must be singular, which means its determinant is zero. For a matrix A=[acbd], the determinant is given by ∣A∣=ad−bc.
For the matrix to be singular, we must satisfy the condition ad−bc=0, or more simply:
This is the heartbeat of our problem. We are not just filling slots; we are hunting for pairs of products that match.
The Strategy of Cases
Trying to check all 44=256 possible matrices would be a tedious, error-prone endeavor. Instead, let us be strategic.
We will categorize our search based on the number of distinct elements used. This is the mark of a true mathematician: breaking a complex problem into smaller, solvable pieces.
Case 1
The Uniformity
What if all four elements are identical? Let a=b=c=d=x.
The condition ad=bc becomes x2=x2, which is always true. Since we have four choices for x from our set {2,3,6,9}, we immediately find 4 singular matrices.
Case 2
The Two-Element Dance
Now, suppose we use exactly two distinct elements, x and y. We need ad=bc using only these two.
The only way to satisfy this is if the products are equal, which happens when ad=bc=xy. This leads to four specific arrangements for any pair {x,y}:
[xyxy],[yxyx],[xxyy], and [yyxx]
Since there are (24)=6 ways to choose two distinct elements from our set, and each pair gives us 4 matrices, we have 6×4= 24 singular matrices here.
Case 3
The Empty Trap
What about using three distinct elements? One must be repeated. Let x be the repeated element.
The condition ad=bc becomes x2=yz. We must check if the square of any element in our set equals the product of two other distinct elements.
Testing 22=4, 32=9, 62=36, and 92=81 against the products of the remaining elements reveals no matches. This case is a ghost; it yields 0 matrices.
Case 4
The Perfect Match
Finally, we consider the case where all four elements are distinct. We must use all four numbers: 2,3,6,9.
We need to partition them into two pairs with equal products. Looking at the numbers, we see 2×9=18 and 3×6=18.
We can place the pair {2,9} on the main diagonal in 2! ways, and the pair {3,6} on the off-diagonal in 2! ways, giving 2×2=4 matrices. We can also swap the diagonals, placing {3,6} on the main diagonal and {2,9} on the off-diagonal, giving another 4 matrices.
Total for this case: 4+4= 8.
The Grand Finale
We have traversed the landscape of possibilities. Adding our results:
4 (Case 1)+24 (Case 2)+0 (Case 3)+8 (Case 4)=36
There are exactly 36 singular matrices. It is a beautiful result, born not from brute force, but from the structured, logical beauty of case analysis.