Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing before a mirror. The reflection you see is a perfect, inverted copy of yourself. In the world of linear algebra, some matrices possess this exact property—they are their own inverse. These are called involutory matrices.
We are analyzing the matrix:
A=[acbd]
where the elements are chosen from the set
S={−1,0,1,…,10}.
The Identity Revelation
The problem provides a beautiful starting point:
A=A−1. If we multiply both sides by
A, we get
A⋅A=A⋅A−1, which simplifies to:
A2=I
This is our North Star. It tells us that applying the transformation
A twice brings us back to the identity matrix:
I=[1001]
The System of Equations
Now, let us compute
A2 explicitly. By multiplying the matrix by itself, we obtain:
A2=[a2+bcc(a+d)b(a+d)bc+d2]
Equating this to the identity matrix gives us four powerful equations:
1) a2+bc=1
2) b(a+d)=0
3) c(a+d)=0
4) bc+d2=1
Notice the symmetry! Equations (2) and (3) both feature the term (a+d). This is our fork in the road.
The Great Bifurcation
Case I
We must split our analysis into two logical cases. Case I: a+d=0.
If a+d=0, then d=−a. Since a and d must be in our set S={−1,0,1,…,10}, we check the possibilities:
If a=1, then d=−1.
If a=0, then d=0.
* If a=−1, then d=1.
For a=1 and d=−1, the equation a2+bc=1 becomes 1+bc=1, so bc=0. This means either b=0 or c=0. Counting these pairs, we have 12 choices for b (with c=0) and 12 for c (with b=0), minus the overlap where both are zero, giving us 23 pairs.
The same logic applies to a=−1 and d=1, yielding another 23 pairs. For a=0 and d=0, we get bc=1, which only happens if (b,c)=(1,1) or (−1,−1), giving us 2 more pairs.
Total for Case I: 23+23+2=48.
The Great Bifurcation
Case II
Case II: $a+d
eq 0$.
If $a+d
eq 0$, then equations (2) and (3) force b=0 and c=0. Substituting these into our diagonal equations, we get a2=1 and d2=1.
This means a and d must be 1 or −1. However, we must satisfy $a+d
eq 0$. If a=1 and d=−1, the sum is zero, which is forbidden. Thus, a and d must have the same sign.
We have two possibilities: (1,1) and (−1,−1). This gives us 2 more matrices.
The Grand Finale
Adding our results together, we have 48+2=50.
We have successfully navigated the constraints, avoided the double-counting traps, and arrived at the elegant solution of 50. Mathematics is not just about numbers; it is about finding the structure within the chaos.