The Data Detective's Lab
Welcome, future engineers! Today, we are not just solving a statistics problem; we are acting as Data Detectives. In the world of JEE Advanced, you will often encounter scenarios where the data you are given is 'corrupted' or 'incorrect.'
Your job is not just to calculate, but to reconstruct the truth from the ashes of the error. Let us dive into this problem with the precision of a surgeon.
Phase 1
The Anatomy of the Error
We start with ten students. We are given an incorrect mean, xˉold=50, and an incorrect standard deviation, σold=12. The problem tells us that two marks were misread: 20 and 25 were recorded as 45 and 50.
Before we panic, let us remember the definition of the mean: xˉ=n∑x. This tells us that the mean is simply the total sum of all marks divided by the number of students.
If we know the mean and the count, we know the total sum. For our incorrect data, the sum is:
∑xold=n×xˉold=10×50=500
This is our starting point. We have a total of 500 marks, but it is built on a lie. We need to purge the incorrect values and inject the correct ones.
The correction is straightforward:
∑xnew=∑xold−(45+50)+(20+25)
Calculating this, we get ∑xnew=500−95+45=450. Now, we have the correct sum. The new mean is simply xˉnew=10450=45.
Notice how the mean dropped? That makes sense, as we removed higher values and added lower ones.
Phase 2
The Hidden Engine (Sum of Squares)
Now, here is where most students stumble. They try to adjust the variance directly. But variance is not a linear quantity!
It is a measure of the 'spread' of the data, and it relies on the square of the values. To fix the variance, we must fix the 'Sum of Squares', denoted as ∑x2.
We use the standard variance formula:
Let us use our incorrect data to find the incorrect sum of squares. We know σold2=122=144. Substituting this into the formula:
Solving for ∑xold2, we get:
10∑xold2=2644⟹∑xold2=26440
This number, 26440, is the 'Sum of Squares' of the incorrect data. It is the engine that drove the incorrect variance.
Phase 3
The Reconstruction
Now, we perform the same surgery on the Sum of Squares that we did on the Sum of Observations. We subtract the squares of the wrong numbers and add the squares of the correct ones:
∑xnew2=∑xold2−(452+502)+(202+252)
∑xnew2=26440−(2025+2500)+(400+625)
∑xnew2=26440−4525+1025=22940
We are almost there! We have the correct sum of squares, 22940, and the correct mean, 45. We just need to plug these into the variance formula one last time to find the truth.
The Final Victory
σnew2=n∑xnew2−(xˉnew)2
And there it is: 269. The correct variance.
You see, the math did not change; only our perspective did. By breaking the problem down into the 'Sum of Observations' and the 'Sum of Squares', we turned a complex error into a simple, manageable calculation. Keep this systematic approach in your toolkit, and no statistics problem will ever intimidate you again!