The Illusion of Complexity
A Journey Through Binomial Expansion
When you first look at a problem like finding the coefficient of x2012 in the expansion of (1−x)2008(1+x+x2)2007, it is natural to feel a surge of intimidation. The exponents are massive, the expression looks unwieldy, and the prospect of expanding these terms seems like a task for a supercomputer, not a student.
But here is the secret of the JEE Advanced: Complexity is often just a mask for elegance.
Phase 1
The Strategic Split
Our first step is to stop looking at the numbers as obstacles and start seeing them as opportunities. We have (1−x)2008 and (1+x+x2)2007. Notice that 2008 and 2007 are almost identical.
In the world of algebra, when you see exponents that are off by one, you should immediately think about 'borrowing.' We can rewrite (1−x)2008 as (1−x)⋅(1−x)2007.
Now, our expression looks like this:
(1−x)⋅(1−x)2007⋅(1+x+x2)2007
By doing this, we have successfully isolated a single (1−x) term and created a pair of terms with the same exponent, 2007. This is the moment the problem begins to yield.
Phase 2
The Hidden Identity
Now, we use the power rule an⋅bn=(ab)n. We group the terms with the exponent 2007 together:
(1−x)⋅[(1−x)(1+x+x2)]2007
Look closely at the expression inside the bracket: (1−x)(1+x+x2). If you have been practicing your algebraic identities, this should trigger a recognition.
This is the classic difference of cubes identity: (a−b)(a2+ab+b2)=a3−b3. With a=1 and b=x, this entire bracket collapses into 1−x3. Our massive, intimidating expression has now simplified to:
Phase 3
The Systematic Search
We are now in a much stronger position. We need to find the coefficient of x2012 in (1−x)(1−x3)2007. Let's expand (1−x3)2007 using the general term formula for binomial expansion, Tr+1=(rn)an−rbr.
Here, n=2007, a=1, and b=−x3:
Tr+1=(r2007)(1)2007−r(−x3)r=(−1)r(r2007)x3r
Now, we multiply this entire series by the (1−x) we left outside:
(1−x)r=0∑2007(−1)r(r2007)x3r=∑(−1)r(r2007)x3r−∑(−1)r(r2007)x3r+1
Phase 4
The Final Verdict
We are hunting for x2012. This means we need to check if either 3r=2012 or 3r+1=2012 yields an integer value for r.
1. For the first part, 3r=2012⟹r=32012=670.66... (Not an integer).
2. For the second part, 3r+1=2012⟹3r=2011⟹r=32011=670.33... (Not an integer).
Since neither case produces an integer r, it means the term x2012 simply does not exist in this expansion. It is not there! And if a term is missing, its coefficient is, by definition, 0.
Conclusion
This problem is a masterclass in not panicking. By using the 'borrowing' technique and recognizing the difference of cubes, we turned a mountain into a molehill.
The final answer, 0, is not a failure—it is the result of a rigorous, logical journey. Keep practicing these manipulations; the more you do, the more you will see the beauty hidden behind the numbers.