Analyzing the Setup
Imagine standing on the coordinate plane, looking at the elegant curve of the parabola y2=4x. It is a simple shape, yet it hides profound secrets.
We are given a point (h,k) and told that three distinct normals can be drawn from it to the parabola. Our mission is to prove that h>2.
The Language of Normals
To understand the normals, we must speak their language. The equation of a normal to the parabola y2=4ax with slope m is given by:
By comparing our parabola y2=4x to the standard form, we immediately identify a=1. Substituting this, our normal equation becomes:
This equation is powerful because it encapsulates every possible normal to the parabola in terms of its slope m.
The Cubic Bridge
We are told the normal passes through (h,k). This is the bridge between geometry and algebra. By substituting x=h and y=k into our normal equation, we get:
Rearranging this, we arrive at a cubic equation in m:
The roots of this cubic, m1,m2,m3, represent the slopes of the three distinct normals passing through (h,k). The fact that there are three distinct normals means this cubic must have three distinct real roots.
The Vieta Insight
Now, we invoke the wisdom of Vieta. For our cubic m3+0⋅m2−(h−2)m+k=0, the sum of the roots is m1+m2+m3=0.
The sum of the products of the roots taken two at a time is:
m1m2+m2m3+m3m1=−(h−2)
We use the algebraic identity:
(m1+m2+m3)2=m12+m22+m32+2(m1m2+m2m3+m3m1)
Substituting our Vieta relations, we get:
02=(m12+m22+m32)+2[−(h−2)]
This simplifies to:
The Final Revelation
Here is the moment of truth. We know that m1,m2,m3 are distinct real numbers.
The sum of the squares of distinct real numbers must be strictly greater than zero. Therefore:
This implies h−2>0, or h>2.
We have arrived at the destination. The geometry of the parabola dictates that for three normals to exist, the point must lie to the right of x=2.